Suantum of Quolace? Something of Boris?
Nov. 16th, 2008 07:30 pmJust got back this red hot second from Quantum of Solace. Can't talk now. Still trying to figure out what the hell happened through most of it ("I have a suitcase? Do you want it? Make me an offer? I'm a geologist? I'm not a geologist? Was I supposed to kill you? Are you going to kill me? Who's that guy? Why hasn't he killed you yet? Look, whatever, call me. \m/ "). Will discuss later.
(Also, we got every trailer in the world EXCEPT Watchmen. *shakes fist at sky*)
Hey, polls are fun! Why don't y'all play with one that I wrote before I left while I go figure out what the hell Quantum of Solace was about, other than "My vengeful manpain, let me show you itit's pretty hot, I think you'll like it"? Let me give you a little background on each question first, though:
1) Quantum of Solace made $70 million this weekend ($70,000,036, now that we've seen it), a record for a Bond movie. By comparison, The Dark Knight made something like $158 million its first weekend, but keep in mind that they were showing it around the damn clock--I saw it at 9 am that Saturday--and also, it was the summer. And the economy hadn't completely tanked yet. (ETA: Take the Dark Knight number as "money that Twilight could not possibly make." So we have "really really good for a November weekend" and "no way in hell," those are the numbers I'm giving you.)
(As a side note, a Twilight/Robert Pattinson feature ran in the A&E supplement of our Sunday paper this morning. The title? "The dark knight." I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE.)
2) There's a premiere in LA tomorrow. Apparently they'll be handing out fan wristbands (oh God) at noon, but I'm unclear on when the movie actually starts. And the wristbands may be just for people to stand next to the red carpet and scream. Regardless of who actually is sitting in that theater when the movie runs, even if it's just industry types, I think there is a certain eventuality we can definitely count on.
Remember: place your bets realistically. E-cookies and bragging rights are at stake here.
[Poll #1298650]

(Also, we got every trailer in the world EXCEPT Watchmen. *shakes fist at sky*)
Hey, polls are fun! Why don't y'all play with one that I wrote before I left while I go figure out what the hell Quantum of Solace was about, other than "My vengeful manpain, let me show you it
1) Quantum of Solace made $70 million this weekend ($70,000,036, now that we've seen it), a record for a Bond movie. By comparison, The Dark Knight made something like $158 million its first weekend, but keep in mind that they were showing it around the damn clock--I saw it at 9 am that Saturday--and also, it was the summer. And the economy hadn't completely tanked yet. (ETA: Take the Dark Knight number as "money that Twilight could not possibly make." So we have "really really good for a November weekend" and "no way in hell," those are the numbers I'm giving you.)
(As a side note, a Twilight/Robert Pattinson feature ran in the A&E supplement of our Sunday paper this morning. The title? "The dark knight." I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE.)
2) There's a premiere in LA tomorrow. Apparently they'll be handing out fan wristbands (oh God) at noon, but I'm unclear on when the movie actually starts. And the wristbands may be just for people to stand next to the red carpet and scream. Regardless of who actually is sitting in that theater when the movie runs, even if it's just industry types, I think there is a certain eventuality we can definitely count on.
Remember: place your bets realistically. E-cookies and bragging rights are at stake here.
[Poll #1298650]
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:39 am (UTC)I CANNOT WAIT TO SEE THE SPARKLE. I am going to have to hunt down my sparkle eyeshadow, aren't I?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:43 am (UTC)And somehow, even with the Anne Rice, the Tom Cruise, the Brad Pitt playing a sad sack character with EXTRA ADDED sad sackitude, I feel like my crazed teenage vampire period had a lot more authenticity and a lot less TMI creepiness than this latter era.
Which is my story, and I am sticking to it.
(They gave out numbered t-shirts for your spot in line, and I still have mine.)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:26 am (UTC)ICON!!
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:50 am (UTC)However not only do we have the Twihards, but also the lulseekers. And the Twihards who see it multiple times.
And their parents.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:53 am (UTC)On another note, I now love Robert Pattinson for his lack of mouth-to-brain communication. If only my own slip-ups where this hilarious.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:57 am (UTC)Also, you weren't supposed to look THAT closely at the plot. I just said it had a plot, not that it was an airtight Agatha Christie plot. And it was fun, yes? It will be good for m15m someday, perhaps?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:02 am (UTC)...I need to go see it again though, barring the idea that I will have a weird Greene-induced semi-nightmare-chase again.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:58 pm (UTC)...
Ha. You know who's gonna "cream his pants," as RPattz would say? Taylor Lautner. You can just tell. That little tyke is going to be bouncing off the walls, knowing he gets to claim all the sexy in the sequel.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:20 am (UTC)I...may or may not have teared up when Alice came back and I knew everything was going to be alright. Despite the fact that I already know how the book ends and was well aware of the fact that everything was going to be alright. I suck.
But, yes. Wow. That is...that...the books. Goodness me. I don't know what I can say beyond that.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:22 am (UTC)But I did miss this critical piece of evidence that they still want to make it a quote-unquote "Bond Movie": Field's first name is Strawberry.
Good times.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:22 am (UTC)At the end of the movie, my friends and I kind of looked at each other in silence until I said "That man can wear a pair of khakis like none other", to which they all orgasmically responded "YES"
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:30 am (UTC)Sometimes I wished Roger Moore would come back.
Date: 2008-11-17 02:23 am (UTC)Edit:
I don't think Twilight will make that much next weekend, if only because as rabid as the fangirls are, apart from the Internet, I have seriously heard no one talk about it. Granted, I am not a high-school student anymore, so maybe that's part of the reason, but I still haven't felt like it crossed over into the overall public.
I may be wrong, though.
Re: Sometimes I wished Roger Moore would come back.
Date: 2008-11-17 03:02 am (UTC)On the other hand, the scope of the publicity for this movie has been insane. And I think people in the mainstream are now hearing just enough about it to be intrigued, but not so much that they realize it's ridiculous.
Re: Sometimes I wished Roger Moore would come back.
From:Re: Sometimes I wished Roger Moore would come back.
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:28 am (UTC)That said.....YAY FOR THE SHOOTING AND THE CHASING (seriously, I think we had a chase scene for every vehicle known to man) AND THE PUNCHING OF PEOPLE IN THE HEAD. And the funny, that was good too.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 03:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:29 am (UTC)I loved it. I'm going to see it again in a few weeks with my dad (aka, the man who passed down his love of all things Bond to me).
I was torn as to how to answer the Twilight poll. Because I think that it could totally pass $70 million, but it depends on how many fans a) get their parents to advance their allowance so they can have multiple viewings or b) can convince their husbands to go golfing a whole lot so they don't feel guilty dragging the kids to multiple viewings. As for myself, I do plan on seeing it opening weekend, but at the $4 early bird show. :D