Suantum of Quolace? Something of Boris?
Nov. 16th, 2008 07:30 pmJust got back this red hot second from Quantum of Solace. Can't talk now. Still trying to figure out what the hell happened through most of it ("I have a suitcase? Do you want it? Make me an offer? I'm a geologist? I'm not a geologist? Was I supposed to kill you? Are you going to kill me? Who's that guy? Why hasn't he killed you yet? Look, whatever, call me. \m/ "). Will discuss later.
(Also, we got every trailer in the world EXCEPT Watchmen. *shakes fist at sky*)
Hey, polls are fun! Why don't y'all play with one that I wrote before I left while I go figure out what the hell Quantum of Solace was about, other than "My vengeful manpain, let me show you itit's pretty hot, I think you'll like it"? Let me give you a little background on each question first, though:
1) Quantum of Solace made $70 million this weekend ($70,000,036, now that we've seen it), a record for a Bond movie. By comparison, The Dark Knight made something like $158 million its first weekend, but keep in mind that they were showing it around the damn clock--I saw it at 9 am that Saturday--and also, it was the summer. And the economy hadn't completely tanked yet. (ETA: Take the Dark Knight number as "money that Twilight could not possibly make." So we have "really really good for a November weekend" and "no way in hell," those are the numbers I'm giving you.)
(As a side note, a Twilight/Robert Pattinson feature ran in the A&E supplement of our Sunday paper this morning. The title? "The dark knight." I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE.)
2) There's a premiere in LA tomorrow. Apparently they'll be handing out fan wristbands (oh God) at noon, but I'm unclear on when the movie actually starts. And the wristbands may be just for people to stand next to the red carpet and scream. Regardless of who actually is sitting in that theater when the movie runs, even if it's just industry types, I think there is a certain eventuality we can definitely count on.
Remember: place your bets realistically. E-cookies and bragging rights are at stake here.
[Poll #1298650]

(Also, we got every trailer in the world EXCEPT Watchmen. *shakes fist at sky*)
Hey, polls are fun! Why don't y'all play with one that I wrote before I left while I go figure out what the hell Quantum of Solace was about, other than "My vengeful manpain, let me show you it
1) Quantum of Solace made $70 million this weekend ($70,000,036, now that we've seen it), a record for a Bond movie. By comparison, The Dark Knight made something like $158 million its first weekend, but keep in mind that they were showing it around the damn clock--I saw it at 9 am that Saturday--and also, it was the summer. And the economy hadn't completely tanked yet. (ETA: Take the Dark Knight number as "money that Twilight could not possibly make." So we have "really really good for a November weekend" and "no way in hell," those are the numbers I'm giving you.)
(As a side note, a Twilight/Robert Pattinson feature ran in the A&E supplement of our Sunday paper this morning. The title? "The dark knight." I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE.)
2) There's a premiere in LA tomorrow. Apparently they'll be handing out fan wristbands (oh God) at noon, but I'm unclear on when the movie actually starts. And the wristbands may be just for people to stand next to the red carpet and scream. Regardless of who actually is sitting in that theater when the movie runs, even if it's just industry types, I think there is a certain eventuality we can definitely count on.
Remember: place your bets realistically. E-cookies and bragging rights are at stake here.
[Poll #1298650]
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:39 am (UTC)I CANNOT WAIT TO SEE THE SPARKLE. I am going to have to hunt down my sparkle eyeshadow, aren't I?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:43 am (UTC)And somehow, even with the Anne Rice, the Tom Cruise, the Brad Pitt playing a sad sack character with EXTRA ADDED sad sackitude, I feel like my crazed teenage vampire period had a lot more authenticity and a lot less TMI creepiness than this latter era.
Which is my story, and I am sticking to it.
(They gave out numbered t-shirts for your spot in line, and I still have mine.)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:50 am (UTC)However not only do we have the Twihards, but also the lulseekers. And the Twihards who see it multiple times.
And their parents.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:53 am (UTC)On another note, I now love Robert Pattinson for his lack of mouth-to-brain communication. If only my own slip-ups where this hilarious.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:57 am (UTC)Also, you weren't supposed to look THAT closely at the plot. I just said it had a plot, not that it was an airtight Agatha Christie plot. And it was fun, yes? It will be good for m15m someday, perhaps?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:02 am (UTC)...I need to go see it again though, barring the idea that I will have a weird Greene-induced semi-nightmare-chase again.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-17 02:02 am (UTC)