... in which I am schooled by my mother:
She was home at lunch talking about how she'd seen something on the news that morning about Catherine Hardwicke being fired, and she was all proud that she knew what was going on because she'd already heard it from me, and the conversation drifted towards Twilight stuff in general and how Pattinson-as-Edward is "very... magnetic" (she said), and finally she fixes me with this very determined look and says, "Okay, look. Where is Edward at the end of the series? What's happening with him?"
"Uh... nothing, really," I say, perplexed. "It's actually kind of funny you should mention it, because that's what a lot of fans complained about, that he spent the whole fourth book kind of just wringing his hands while Bella was pregnant and then while she took control and took care of everything at the end--"
"But after he imprinted on the baby? Nothing happened with that?"
"... what?"
"After he imprinted on the baby!"
"...WHAT?"
"Edward! On the baby!"
"It's his baby, his baby with Bella--"
"I KNOW! THAT'S WHY IT'S SO AWFUL!"
"NO! NO NO NO! JACOB THE WEREWOLF KID, NOT EDWARD! Jacob imprints on the baby, not Edward, not on his own kid! It's not ACTUAL INCEST! JESUS!"
She takes a moment to process this. Then this beatific look of relief passes over her face. "Well, that's a lot better."
"But Jacob STILL imprints on the baby of the girl he was in love with, the baby he just DELIVERED, and--"
"But at least the FATHER of the baby doesn't."
"You're just really never going to be impressed by anything now, are you? Not after thinking that Edward fell in love with his own kid."
She shakes her head, thoughtfully chewing her deli macaroni and cheese.
"I feel a lot less bad about liking Edward now," she says.
Meanwhile, the real reason I'm going ahead and posting Twicrap separately:
SOURCE: 'Twilight' Sequel Offer From Summit Out To Director Chris Weitz?
1. If he turns them down, Summit's delusional. If he takes them up, they're delusional... like a fox.
2. Because that whole trilogy thing worked out so well for him.
3. Yes, I am STILL BITTER ABOUT THAT.
From
profbutters: 'Twilight' stars see red (subhead: "Pattinson, Stewart want Hardwicke to direct sequel, too"). This was posted before the Weitz news/rumor broke, so no one knows what the situation is now.
Meanwhile, an interview with Robert Pattinson FROM THE FUTURE ("Posted Dec 11, 2008 1:15 PM") where he talks about wanting to take the scene in Bella's room "to the verge of wrong" and also, how he "got sent this really well-bound book with all these Unibomber-type notes"; plus a video interview in which he declares that in real life, Edward would be "one of those guys who would be an ax murderer."
From
umbra_fish: Edward Cullen Crochet Doll. And dig the Joker doll on the sidebar there.
I don't know when the regular linkspam will be up, because I'm going Christmas shopping! Yays!

She was home at lunch talking about how she'd seen something on the news that morning about Catherine Hardwicke being fired, and she was all proud that she knew what was going on because she'd already heard it from me, and the conversation drifted towards Twilight stuff in general and how Pattinson-as-Edward is "very... magnetic" (she said), and finally she fixes me with this very determined look and says, "Okay, look. Where is Edward at the end of the series? What's happening with him?"
"Uh... nothing, really," I say, perplexed. "It's actually kind of funny you should mention it, because that's what a lot of fans complained about, that he spent the whole fourth book kind of just wringing his hands while Bella was pregnant and then while she took control and took care of everything at the end--"
"But after he imprinted on the baby? Nothing happened with that?"
"... what?"
"After he imprinted on the baby!"
"...WHAT?"
"Edward! On the baby!"
"It's his baby, his baby with Bella--"
"I KNOW! THAT'S WHY IT'S SO AWFUL!"
"NO! NO NO NO! JACOB THE WEREWOLF KID, NOT EDWARD! Jacob imprints on the baby, not Edward, not on his own kid! It's not ACTUAL INCEST! JESUS!"
She takes a moment to process this. Then this beatific look of relief passes over her face. "Well, that's a lot better."
"But Jacob STILL imprints on the baby of the girl he was in love with, the baby he just DELIVERED, and--"
"But at least the FATHER of the baby doesn't."
"You're just really never going to be impressed by anything now, are you? Not after thinking that Edward fell in love with his own kid."
She shakes her head, thoughtfully chewing her deli macaroni and cheese.
"I feel a lot less bad about liking Edward now," she says.
Meanwhile, the real reason I'm going ahead and posting Twicrap separately:
SOURCE: 'Twilight' Sequel Offer From Summit Out To Director Chris Weitz?
1. If he turns them down, Summit's delusional. If he takes them up, they're delusional... like a fox.
2. Because that whole trilogy thing worked out so well for him.
3. Yes, I am STILL BITTER ABOUT THAT.
From
Meanwhile, an interview with Robert Pattinson FROM THE FUTURE ("Posted Dec 11, 2008 1:15 PM") where he talks about wanting to take the scene in Bella's room "to the verge of wrong" and also, how he "got sent this really well-bound book with all these Unibomber-type notes"; plus a video interview in which he declares that in real life, Edward would be "one of those guys who would be an ax murderer."
From
I don't know when the regular linkspam will be up, because I'm going Christmas shopping! Yays!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:34 pm (UTC)*is also still bitter about no Subtle Knife or Amber Spyglass*
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 04:32 am (UTC)[/hijack]
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 01:53 am (UTC)but I agree with you guys, your mom is amazing!!!!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:48 pm (UTC)Dammit, why have I not learned to crochet yet?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:58 pm (UTC)Anyway, the HP/Twilight comparisons are ridiculous - the only thing they have in common are fantasy elements; otherwise they're completely different genres and Twilight can't even begin to match HP's sales figures. Twilight is a hit. HP is a phenomenon. It's not even close.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 10:58 pm (UTC)The Rolling Stone interview is fantastic. I nearly headdesked when I read the part about the fan who sent him the Scientology books. Dude, if the Scientologists are trying to get you, you know you've made it.
As for Chris Weitz...I really liked About a Boy.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:16 pm (UTC)I think Summit (at least I HOPE) will realize that the closer they stick to the book, the more money they will make in repeat business from the existing batshit fanbase. Weitz has already directed adaptations from existing novels and TRIED to stay faithful (the visuals on Golden Compass were pretty, at least, even if the ending was innacurate, and About a Boy was really well made) and it might be enough of an interesting challenge for him that he'd take it on.
Better him than some walk-in who's only directed commercials.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:28 pm (UTC)Also, I'm kind of unhappy that I have an opinion on who directs that drivel.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 02:23 am (UTC)all of it.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:37 pm (UTC)Weitz fucked up. Golden Compass. And for that, I will NOT forgive him.
re: Chris Weitz
Date: 2008-12-09 11:37 pm (UTC)I had to look him up but ok, About a Boy was well done. It's not my kind of movie but nothing popped out at me as some crazy "omg the direction sucks," and in fact, I thought the story was well-told. I haven't seen The Golden Compass but I've heard awesome things about it.
So he's got the genre under his belt, and in a fashion that garnered him praise. I think the nature of the film (especially to every day families) restricted the exposure. There is/was a lot of objection to some underlying themes in His Dark Materials. I didn't like the books myself, but certain Brit authors turn me off.
What blows my mind about all of this is, Hardwicke's got no reward. Ok, she got a paycheck and a huge footnote the annals that this is the highest grossing movie for a woman director; and it's like the studio says, "Yeah, thanks, see ya." So they don't want to tack on more time? It's not like the actors are changing from age 10 to age 13 and they have to squeeze them all in. They're teens! And early 20s! They can pull it off for another few years. Give her the extra time and money and let her build on the experience of making this movie.
Re: Chris Weitz
Date: 2008-12-09 11:55 pm (UTC)And if the option runs out before they finish, any of the other studios can swoop in and offer SMeyer whatever amount of money they please...
Which, to some, would sound like a good thing. But it would seriously jeopardize the potential reappearance of the main cast. All that is holding them right now is the contract. And the contract will expire when (or before) the option does.
Sorry to get all technical.
Re: Chris Weitz
From:Re: Chris Weitz
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 11:39 pm (UTC)http://www.bestweekever.tv/2008/12/09/now-you-can-have-your-own-robert-pattinson-doll/
HOLY CRAP.
Date: 2008-12-09 11:39 pm (UTC)this.
is.
amazing.
{in all the wrong ways}
and it's not twilight related,
so that's good.
[says one of the twihards-oh the embarrassment in acknowledging that.}
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 12:12 am (UTC)And I love watching the TwiCrap. It helps keep me distracted from my real-life clusterfuck. ---> I know far too much about it for having not read any of the books. *smug grin* I learned it all right here. Sarcastic fandoming FTW!!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 06:22 am (UTC)