A few things
Feb. 4th, 2009 03:33 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay. I was really traumatized by this link and didn't want to post it, but clearly I'm going to have to: somebody arts-and-crafted Bella's womb. ("It's a GEODE of NO.") (Original link, locked.)
People are weird and they scare me.
Today's Snack Deathmatch: Gummi bears vs. Swedish fish.
Re: Stephen King: For those of you non-fans who now feel the warm fuzzies towards him for the Stephenie Meyer thing (please note that he also complimented her a paragraph later) and want to pick up some of his books, I would personally recommend his short stories. I kept meaning to write about this, actually--I read Just After Sunset last month, and as good as "The Gingerbread Girl" was, it made me realize that I'm really not into what you might call "endurance horror": someone's put in a horrific situation, and the rest of the story is him/her surviving and escaping it, no matter what the cost. I seem to like stories that give you weird little thrills instead--the kind where you put down the book and everything looks a little suspicious to you for a few days afterwards. Earlier collections like Night Shift (favorites: "Strawberry Spring," "I Know What You Need") and Skeleton Crew (favorites: "Mrs. Todd's Shortcut," "The Jaunt," "The Ballad of the Flexible Bullet") are chock full of awesomeness, so I'd say start with those too. Oh, and Different Seasons, which was the basis for The Shawshank Redemption, Apt Pupil, and Stand by Me. (His other new collection, Stephen King Goes to the Movies, anthologizes "Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption," "Children of the Corn," "The Mangler," "Low Men in Yellow Coats" [the basis for Hearts in Atlantis] and "1408.") Nightmares and Dreamscapes is also pretty good (favorite: "It Grows On You"; "The Moving Finger" gave my sister the wig FOR YEARS, and all I did was tell her the story); Everything's Eventual is worth it just for "LT's Theory of Pets" and the first half of "1408" (the hotel manager telling the history of the room). As for Just After Sunset, my favorites were "N." and "Harvey's Dream"--reading it I just felt like I was on a knife's edge the whole time, and I think a lot of it has to do with the wife's perspective of hearing her husband describe the dream, and how he doesn't know that it was foretelling the immediate future, but she does. It's the execution, in other words.
The other book I was going to mention was Melissa Anelli's Harry, A History, which I think I subconsciously put off talking about because of my involvement in discussing the Lexicon trial. I mean, things people found and I posted ended up being used in court. I tried to be as fair as I could, to the point where I stopped offering any commentary at all and just posted the links that people brought me (and noted that I would post whatever pro-Vander Ark material people wanted to contribute). There's a point where you read up enough on something that of course you're going to form an opinion, and I already have strong feelings about the rights of authors vs. fans; I just tried to keep mine out of it as much as possible, and probably didn't entirely succeed, particularly in the beginning, but there you are.
Melissa and Steve were, suffice it to say, on different sides. (In case you're wondering, he's only mentioned once, maybe twice, in the book, and only in passing. Some people thought this was unfair to Steve's status as a BNF, but quite honestly, would his supporters prefer Melissa to talk about him at length? Because I don't know that that would be in his best interest.) So I wondered if I should talk about the book or just never mention anyone's at all, but... well, why not. I really enjoyed Melissa's book--I giggled pretty much through the whole thing, which is a good sign. She did get to interview JK Rowling (who also contributes a foreword) for it, and some substantial Rowlingian insights are woven through the narrative. It's a fun, well-written, conversational read, but I will note that it's very aptly titled--it's a history, from someone who was in a position to witness a lot of the phenomenon, but it's not an exhaustive catalogue of every single nook and cranny of the fandom. It's friendly gossip, not a tell-all exposé. I found it particularly interesting because she talks about a lot of things I didn't know about--I knew very little about wizard rock, for example, and of course there are Rowling's own comments. But, again--it's not a twelve-volume
As for Steve's two books--I'm not going to seek them out, but I wouldn't not read them if they were set in front of me, I guess. My problem is that if I wrote up some kind of review, I doubt anyone would take my opinion seriously, given my involvement. Nor should they, most likely: that suggests that I'm assuming I wouldn't like them, which might be confirmation of my bias right there. Actually, if I did like them, I would say so--I would always have theout comfort of saying, "Which is sad, because they're good enough to stand on their own and the trumped-up controversy of the infringement trial, instead of cooperating and revising, wasn't necessary." And, you know, if I somehow gained a new respect for him, I would say that, too. So I would tell the truth. But, again: I obviously have pre-conceived ideas, in no small part because a good bit of the original, infringing Lexicon manuscript appeared in the court documents and was critiqued in open court. So what I'm saying is, the reason I'm not reading or reviewing his books isn't out of spite; it's because it seems like the fairest thing to do, given what I would probably say about them if I did.
ANYWAY. The reason I even brought this up in the first place is because Melissa's going to be doing a signing at Comic-Con. I often chuck material for future entries at the bottom of the current draft, and I forgot to remove it last night before I hit post, so if you saw something about a signing before I was able to get it off, that's what it was in reference to. I had pulled the info from her blog: "I'm doing a signing at New York Comic Con on February 7, at 11 a.m., at 'Table 2'." Which is on the Autographing Stage at the back of the Exhibition Hall, to be more specific. So, you know, if you're in the neighborhood, drop by, tell her Cleo sent you, etc.
And, in the interest of fair play, I hear Steve's on tour as well. You want me to post dates, I can do that too.

People are weird and they scare me.
Today's Snack Deathmatch: Gummi bears vs. Swedish fish.
Re: Stephen King: For those of you non-fans who now feel the warm fuzzies towards him for the Stephenie Meyer thing (please note that he also complimented her a paragraph later) and want to pick up some of his books, I would personally recommend his short stories. I kept meaning to write about this, actually--I read Just After Sunset last month, and as good as "The Gingerbread Girl" was, it made me realize that I'm really not into what you might call "endurance horror": someone's put in a horrific situation, and the rest of the story is him/her surviving and escaping it, no matter what the cost. I seem to like stories that give you weird little thrills instead--the kind where you put down the book and everything looks a little suspicious to you for a few days afterwards. Earlier collections like Night Shift (favorites: "Strawberry Spring," "I Know What You Need") and Skeleton Crew (favorites: "Mrs. Todd's Shortcut," "The Jaunt," "The Ballad of the Flexible Bullet") are chock full of awesomeness, so I'd say start with those too. Oh, and Different Seasons, which was the basis for The Shawshank Redemption, Apt Pupil, and Stand by Me. (His other new collection, Stephen King Goes to the Movies, anthologizes "Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption," "Children of the Corn," "The Mangler," "Low Men in Yellow Coats" [the basis for Hearts in Atlantis] and "1408.") Nightmares and Dreamscapes is also pretty good (favorite: "It Grows On You"; "The Moving Finger" gave my sister the wig FOR YEARS, and all I did was tell her the story); Everything's Eventual is worth it just for "LT's Theory of Pets" and the first half of "1408" (the hotel manager telling the history of the room). As for Just After Sunset, my favorites were "N." and "Harvey's Dream"--reading it I just felt like I was on a knife's edge the whole time, and I think a lot of it has to do with the wife's perspective of hearing her husband describe the dream, and how he doesn't know that it was foretelling the immediate future, but she does. It's the execution, in other words.
The other book I was going to mention was Melissa Anelli's Harry, A History, which I think I subconsciously put off talking about because of my involvement in discussing the Lexicon trial. I mean, things people found and I posted ended up being used in court. I tried to be as fair as I could, to the point where I stopped offering any commentary at all and just posted the links that people brought me (and noted that I would post whatever pro-Vander Ark material people wanted to contribute). There's a point where you read up enough on something that of course you're going to form an opinion, and I already have strong feelings about the rights of authors vs. fans; I just tried to keep mine out of it as much as possible, and probably didn't entirely succeed, particularly in the beginning, but there you are.
Melissa and Steve were, suffice it to say, on different sides. (In case you're wondering, he's only mentioned once, maybe twice, in the book, and only in passing. Some people thought this was unfair to Steve's status as a BNF, but quite honestly, would his supporters prefer Melissa to talk about him at length? Because I don't know that that would be in his best interest.) So I wondered if I should talk about the book or just never mention anyone's at all, but... well, why not. I really enjoyed Melissa's book--I giggled pretty much through the whole thing, which is a good sign. She did get to interview JK Rowling (who also contributes a foreword) for it, and some substantial Rowlingian insights are woven through the narrative. It's a fun, well-written, conversational read, but I will note that it's very aptly titled--it's a history, from someone who was in a position to witness a lot of the phenomenon, but it's not an exhaustive catalogue of every single nook and cranny of the fandom. It's friendly gossip, not a tell-all exposé. I found it particularly interesting because she talks about a lot of things I didn't know about--I knew very little about wizard rock, for example, and of course there are Rowling's own comments. But, again--it's not a twelve-volume
As for Steve's two books--I'm not going to seek them out, but I wouldn't not read them if they were set in front of me, I guess. My problem is that if I wrote up some kind of review, I doubt anyone would take my opinion seriously, given my involvement. Nor should they, most likely: that suggests that I'm assuming I wouldn't like them, which might be confirmation of my bias right there. Actually, if I did like them, I would say so--I would always have the
ANYWAY. The reason I even brought this up in the first place is because Melissa's going to be doing a signing at Comic-Con. I often chuck material for future entries at the bottom of the current draft, and I forgot to remove it last night before I hit post, so if you saw something about a signing before I was able to get it off, that's what it was in reference to. I had pulled the info from her blog: "I'm doing a signing at New York Comic Con on February 7, at 11 a.m., at 'Table 2'." Which is on the Autographing Stage at the back of the Exhibition Hall, to be more specific. So, you know, if you're in the neighborhood, drop by, tell her Cleo sent you, etc.
And, in the interest of fair play, I hear Steve's on tour as well. You want me to post dates, I can do that too.


no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 09:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:58 pm (UTC)I think King gets shorted because folks think of him as horror, despite the fact that some of his most successful cross-over stuff is not horror.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 09:43 pm (UTC)I get what they were trying for, but it just looks like felt lumped together to me.
The medium of felt-craft does not lend itself to delicate internal organs, methinks.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 09:45 pm (UTC)RE: Bella's womb
Date: 2009-02-04 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 09:50 pm (UTC)Thanks for the King recs.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:01 pm (UTC)And here I thought that some Christian group's "Ex-Masturbator" t-shirts (no, I'm not making this up (http://skepchick.org/blog/?p=5866)) was the most brain-breaking thing I could expect to see all week. Clearly I was mistaken.
Just... wow.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:02 pm (UTC)1. AAAAAHHHH HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAA. I love arts and crafts even more when they're completely WTF.
2. I look at the wool-felt sculptures I had made of my dogs and sigh.
3. This is like the fifth thing having to do with wombs and pregnancy I've come across today. I feel like I should be worried about it.
I also have to agree that King's short stories are the way to go if you're going to read him, but I might be biased because I vastly prefer horror literature in the short form, anyway.
"The Boogeyman" scared the crap out of me when I was a kid, and I still go around checking my closets for a few days and making sure they're all completely closed before I go to bed every time I read it.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:12 pm (UTC)It really felt like I had experienced the fandom all over again without all the angst at the time.
*Goes to re-read* :p
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:23 pm (UTC)Irony? :D
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:24 pm (UTC)I'm just overall in love with him (umm, The Stand and It are favorites), but I think I've read all of his short stories.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:00 pm (UTC)GAWD. XD!!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 10:41 pm (UTC)There is not enough o.O in the world for this.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:05 pm (UTC)I need to go bleach my brain now to get rid of that womb image. Why did I click???
On another note, thanks for the Stephen King recommendations. I always meant to read some of his work, but shied away from his novels because I'm a wimp and can't handle horror. So maybe I'll fare better with his short stories.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:05 pm (UTC)If you think you want to get into him, I'd start with 'Salem's Lot. One of his earliest and still the best. But one of my favorite books ever will always be The Stand.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:SK recommendations
Date: 2009-02-04 11:05 pm (UTC)A year or two later, he came out with "Lisle's Story." Uncharacteristically of me, I read it while it was still in hard cover.
Don't get me wrong - it's still definitively S. King - scary, creepy, etc. - but it's sort of like he said, "Oh, you want Lit-ra-chure? I'll just go with really good writing that's more readable that most of your careers have put out." It tells a really true, well written story of a marriage ..... and scares the bejesus out of you at the same time.
It's long. But it's in paperback now (and probably at your local library). I'd recommend it, for sure. Just keep the lights on....
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:22 pm (UTC)As to the King recommendations, the first King book I ever read was The Stand, and I loved it and would suggest it to anyone who's looking for a good King book. Though, I suppose it could be classified as "endurance horror", as you put it. King does put a good twist into the whole thing, though. :) (Speaking of plague-set books, I just finished reading I Am Legend, and it was really good. Nothing like the movie, but still really, really good.)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 12:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 12:12 am (UTC)I got your book in today! I am so excited! I can't seem to stop using exclamation points!
I'll go now.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 12:20 am (UTC)After the shameless way SVA tried to profit from JKR's work, I wouldn't touch his books with a ten-foot pole, even if those are his own work. I'm just not good at letting go of grudges, particularly in this sort of situation.
That said, I wouldn't pick up Melissa's book either (seen it in bookshops, never been tempted to even skimming it). Haven't been to TLC - not properly - in years, and the thing that put me off it the most was what I perceived as Melissa's completely sycophantic/patronising behaviour. It could be a horribly mistaken impression, and it's a cruel assessment, but during my, er, last few months there, all I could get from her posts was "Lalala, we love JKR, and we will let her know as much as often as possible, and we will never be critical of anything she says (hehehe, silly Harmonians, as if WE hadn't guessed at JKR's point a mile away), because we want her to keep loving us back, and aren't we the best writer hags ever?"
It all just came off as so blatantly suck-uppy and patronising that I was totally put off. Not nice.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 12:36 am (UTC)For bonus points, I was listening with my younger brother, who is severely obsessive compulsive. So that was ...interesting.