![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay, I'm going to break out a mini-spam here--I might do another linkspam later, but I'm trying to really get some work done today, and--this stuff can't wait.
JK Rowling talks in-depth about the Veil.
Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart on THE BEST MAGAZINE COVER EVER. I try to stay apolitical on this journal, so... just take it as a link about mockery of the media.
Rachel McAdams Discovered by Sherlock Holmes. LEAVE IRENE ADLER OUT OF THIS. I DON'T TRUST Y'ALL NOT TO SCREW THIS UP.
Johnny Depp as the Lone Ranger what?
1. Wait, this actually happened?
2. Well, they were also announcing ideas for POTC4. Hell, he probably puts that costume on to go to the corner store sometimes.
2. I just went back to the link to write this up, and MTV is saying now that he's going to play Tonto. What the actual fuck, y'all.
ETA: Can someone go look into this for me? And possibly file a complaint if it's warranted? I'm trying to finish this project by next week and it's crunch time and this bizarro plagiarism shit makes my head hurt.

JK Rowling talks in-depth about the Veil.
Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart on THE BEST MAGAZINE COVER EVER. I try to stay apolitical on this journal, so... just take it as a link about mockery of the media.
Rachel McAdams Discovered by Sherlock Holmes. LEAVE IRENE ADLER OUT OF THIS. I DON'T TRUST Y'ALL NOT TO SCREW THIS UP.
Johnny Depp as the Lone Ranger what?
“During Disney’s preview today in Hollywood, the studio questioned who could possibly play the titular character in its upcoming feature The Lone Ranger.”
“At that, Disney rolled out the USC marching band to come down and play the Ranger’s theme song. This was followed by an appearance by Depp himself who took to the stage in full Captain Jack Sparrow attire…wearing The Lone Ranger’s mask.”
1. Wait, this actually happened?
2. Well, they were also announcing ideas for POTC4. Hell, he probably puts that costume on to go to the corner store sometimes.
2. I just went back to the link to write this up, and MTV is saying now that he's going to play Tonto. What the actual fuck, y'all.
ETA: Can someone go look into this for me? And possibly file a complaint if it's warranted? I'm trying to finish this project by next week and it's crunch time and this bizarro plagiarism shit makes my head hurt.


no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 04:54 pm (UTC)Well, I sure would.
Also? Stewart/Colbert '08, please. So we can stop pretending politics isn't just entertainment.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 04:54 pm (UTC)*is British and thought Tonto was the horse...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 04:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 04:55 pm (UTC)i wonder if she explains what happened to sirius black *clicks link*
also, who's playing holmes? i dunno if i like the idea of a more playful holmes and allegedly "obscured character traits" as the article puts it..
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 04:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 12:02 pm (UTC)It was if Rowling got to that point in the book, said "crap, I need to get Sirius out of the way", and quickly penned the equivalent of "and then a monster appeared and ate him for no reason".
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:01 pm (UTC)Right there with you, Cleo!
Also, why is there no record of this Depp incident in picture form?? I demand visual proof!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:11 pm (UTC)If Johnny Depp is playing Tonto and not the Lone Ranger, that's just seriously lame, and I love Johnny Depp. Hollywood, it's no longer the '50s; stop hiring white dudes to play Native Americans.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:17 pm (UTC)But I think it's weird anyone would call the "EW" cover a satire while refraining from pointing out that the ORIGINAL cover from "The New Yorker" was itself a satire. In fact, the original was a *pointed* satire at the media, whereas the "EW" cover was really more of a benign and goofy parody than a satire. (That is, it has no real point to make, other than to score a knowing wink.)
I didn't like that cover of "The New Yorker," but I think one should at least admit what it is and not attack it for being what it isn't. In fact, the feature article on Obama in that issue did NOT portray him as any sort of radical at all. If anything, it portrayed him (as a young man) as a brilliant but otherwise rather typical Chicago Democratic party machine bureaucrat. Yes, the article attacked him FROM THE LEFT. Because it's "The New Yorker," not "The National Review." Way to COMPLETELY miss the point, people.
Oh, and another thing, "EW": you're not on firm ground for attacking other
magazine'smagazines' COVERS.no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 04:21 am (UTC)I mean, don't get me wrong, I read a lot of different magazines (though the New Yorker isn't one of them at this time; I'm actually mostly on a New Scientist/Scientific American/Scientific American Mind/Psychology Today/Mental Floss/skeptic-oriented kick these past few months, and I only have so much spare cash, ya know?)...
...and right now? As in, like, RIGHT NOW, now?
Last week's Entertainment Weekly was ONE OF THE FEW VOICES OF REASON THAT I READ ON POLITICS I SHIT YOU NOT.
They had a full-page open-letter-style article (for instance) basically begging the news networks NOT to treat the occasionaally-rated-higher-than-American-Idol presidential race as if it were reality TV or a soap opera (talking about "personal stories", relatability, etc., as opposed to, you know... issues and facts and the candidates' stances on them)... to you know, NOT go to candidates' fucking "spin rooms" to get "scoops", but rather do, say, full specials on "what they lied about", or on important issues that are actually, you know, about the issues.
Which, of course, CNN did NOT DO. Ever. And still really hasn't. None of the other networks either, from what I've seen. They treated it... like a reality TV/soap opera hybrid, just like EW basically predicted they would and begged them not to.
In short? Yes, they cover silly stuff, too. But they've also got better integrity than any television news source around the past few weeks. Which is, of course, utterly sad but last week it was to my mind indisputably true, too.
(I've heard EW referred to as the "smartest mainstream entertainment magazine". At this point, I believe it.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:19 pm (UTC)2) Loved the explanation for the veil-- religion in HP is something totally fascinates me!
3) And... The part of me that's a Holmes purist is totally cringing right now. Irene Adler is fascinating because she's the one woman who totally stumps Holmes. And makes him respect women. That short story does a lot for the character of Holmes. It's also one of my favorites. So I'll be a bit wary of going to see this movie.
4) If Depp plays Tonto... that will be extremely frustrating.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:35 pm (UTC)Even more mind-boggling, according to that article there were rumors that Russell Crowe was going to play Moriarty. Wait, what?
This...
was going to be portrayed by this guy?
Russell looks nearly as skeptical as I feel.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:42 pm (UTC)Johnny as Tonto, eh? Well...he is part-Native American. Was it Cherokee? Something, anyway.
I am both very excited and very worried about this Holmes adaptation. I mean, plus side: RDJr. Minus side? All this stuff about taking away Holmes's cool character traits and giving him a love interest. THEN HE WON'T BE HOLMES ANYMORE. *sigh* Although, yes, if they're going to do a love interest, Irene Adler's the only woman he ever showed *any* interest in, but still.
If there's a kiss I may have to throw something at the screen.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 07:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:54 pm (UTC)According to FF.net's TOS, you (or someone you appoint to act on your behalf) need to contact the admins at support@fanfiction.net and provide the following information:
With the restriction on who can contact them regarding the copyright violation, your flist will have a hard time taking on FF.net
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:06 pm (UTC)"Yeeeah. This isn't original, since whole lines have been lifted directly from Cleolinda's M15M on Phantom. For example:
Your line: "We can tell that she is an official nurse because of the gigantic stork-like white nurse hat on her head that makes her look more like a flying nun."
Cleo's line: "We know she’s an official nurse because she has a gigantic stork-like white nurse hat. "
You added a phrase! How cunning! That's no plagarism at all! *eyeroll*
Your line: "Auctioner: Sold, to the decrepit older gentleman with the flying nun! (The Monkey Box is given to Old Raoul. He holds it reverently for some odd reason. His singing voice-over now comes up.)"
Cleo's line: "AUCTIONEER: Sold! To the ancient gentleman with the Flying Nun. Moving on to… Lot 666, the Broken Chandelier OF DOOM—"
Again! Look at the similarities! I haven't even made it down 20 lines yet and that's 2 cases that scream "I have no imagination." Shall I go on?
Cleo's line: "AUCTIONEER: Sold! To the ancient gentleman with the Flying Nun. Moving on to… Lot 666, the Broken Chandelier OF DOOM—
© 2005 Cleolinda Jones. All rights reserved. cleolinda.livejournal.com
ASSISTANT: And exposition.
AUCTIONEER: —OF DOOM AND EXPOSITION!"
Your line: "Auctioneer: Alright, alright, keep your bun in a bunch. Lot 666 is the Fated Chandelier of DOOM!
(Silence; nobody reacts. The Assistant steps back up to his side.)
Assistant (whispering): And exposition.
Auctioneer: Oh, I'm sorry. That's the Fated Chandelier of Doom and Exposition!"
Really? You couldn't even drop the capitals from Cleo's M15M? You're cut-and-paste-fu is mighty. Good thing you remembered to delete out that COPYRIGHT that shows up on hers, huh?
Anyway, I've made my point. You=fail."
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:37 pm (UTC)Taking it with a grain of salt, though...hasn't Depp supposedly been "to play" a whole bunch of roles recently?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:43 pm (UTC)This may or may not have to do with my feelings about the Sweeney Todd movie. *cough*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 07:18 pm (UTC)Despite the fact that this is insulting to Native American actors everywhere (unless Depp can prove some Indian blood, which with those cheekbones he may well have), my head just exploded a little after reading that, because my first thought was "Oh, please GOD let Christian Bale play the Lone Ranger!"
Eeek. Just the thought...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 07:43 pm (UTC)...just take it as a link about mockery of the media.
That's exactly what it is. It's not a very political article. Yes, they do talk about politics, but mostly they talk about it in relation to the mainstream media, which has always been their target, and how the political system and the media have this back and forth that has created this soulless, hollow, bullshitty...thing.
Anyhoo. I love those guys.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 07:45 pm (UTC)There, I said it.
Stephen Colbert and John Stewart are the best thing to happen to politics in a looong time.
I want that cover on my wall.
RE: POTO plagiarism.
Date: 2008-09-25 08:50 pm (UTC)from the "author":
"Now, in some of your reviews, there have been questions as to whether or not the cousins and the friends who leant me the script from THEIR parody are the creator of the 'POTO in 15 Minutes' parody. This is, in fact, true, and they have finally relented with their script and allowed me to post it on here. That is good for all of us. But I will admit that some of this I did not write, but have taken from their given script. However, because I do NOT want to be accused of plagiarism, I am adding a LOT more of my own jokes, including song parodies, which they did NOT do, as well as insulting continually annoying and stubborn POTO Purists of different sides, obsessive Phangirls, and a LOT more that I WON'T tell you about, because it will ruin the story for you. Also, I include much more dialogue then their '15 Min.' version. Okay? Good. Glad we got that all cleared up. Now, back to the story and our first song parody. "
Re: POTO plagiarism.
Date: 2008-09-25 09:05 pm (UTC)ETA: Okay, you know what? I didn't quite grasp that she was claiming her cousin wrote the 15M thing, not me. NOW I'm mad.
Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From:Re: POTO plagiarism.
From: