Oscar nominations!
Feb. 2nd, 2010 08:45 am1) Full list here.
2) Yeah, they're doing ten Best Picture nominees this year. I remember the Academy president saying, when they announced this change a few months ago, something to the effect of, "If I said this had nothing to do with The Dark Knight [not getting nominated last year], I'd be lying." So they're trying to be... more inclusive this year, because the big studios get pissed when they do put out genuinely good movies that then get snubbed in favor of blatant Oscarbait that doesn't really hold up a few years later. (Remember a couple of years ago on Extras, when Ricky Gervais told Kate Winslet that she'd need to play a Nazi if she actually wanted to win?)
3) THE BLIND SIDE FOR BEST PICTURE, WHAT THE FUCK?
A conversation I just had with my mother, who loves Sandra Bullock (aw, she's nice) and football (GRARRRRR):
"THE BLIND SIDE? WHAT."
"Well, when that many people see a movie..."
"But that doesn't mean it's GOOD."
"It IS good."
"You don't know! You didn't see it!"
"I saw enough of it!"
"ON COMMERCIALS!"
I'm going to take her to see it and we're going to settle this bullshit for once and for all.
ETA: As Roger Ebert notes, if you match up Best Director nominations to Best Picture, you get the five "real" nominees: Avatar, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, Precious and Up in the Air. Bear in mind, though, that even when we had only five, Director and Picture did not always match up--a movie could have really strong visual flair and yet not have the writing or acting to really make it a "best" movie. This year, though, I think it would hold true, because those five generally match the nominations from other awards we've seen this year. So, you know, maybe ten isn't so bad--movies like Up and District 9 got acknowledged, and probably would not have been otherwise--Up is, in fact, the first animated film to be nominated for Best Picture since Beauty and the Beast.
4) The Hurt Locker is coming on really strong. People have talked about what a shame it is that Jeremy Renner hasn't gotten in for a lot of acting awards previous to this (despite wails of chagrin that he should have), so for him to actually get the big-time nomination says a lot. And the movie just won the Producers Guild Award, which isn't a guarantee, but tends to be fairly predictive, as is the Directors Guild Award, which Kathryn Bigelow won this weekend--the first woman to do so. I don't know about Best Picture per se, but I would definitely put her down in your Oscar pool--particularly since James Cameron has been openly very happy for her* (they were married way, way back in the day) and they're still really friendly. There may be a thought process of, "Aw, hell, Avatar just made two billion dollars and it's now the highest-grossing movie of all time and there were all these groundbreaking effects so I guess we're supposed to give Best Director to The King of the World AGAIN--wait, he's supporting Kathryn Bigelow? Whose movie was massively, critically acclaimed? You mean we can give it to someone else who would also deserve it and he'll be happy about it? And then we also get credit for giving it to a woman for the first time? Well, HOT DAMN."
* (At the DGA ceremony, Carl Reiner--I guess he was hosting?--joked that only four people in the room weren't happy for Bigelow, who was a very popular winner--that is to say, the other four nominees. At which point Cameron apparently piped up, "Only three." AWWWW.)
5) A few surprises: District 9 came on strong (Best Picture, for real), and Maggie Gyllenhaal got a Supporting Actress nomination--shutting out both Mélanie Laurent and Diane Kruger from Inglourious Basterds (although I believe they submitted Laurent for Best Actress, and you see how well that worked out).
6) Not announced on TV: Best Costume.
* “Bright Star” Janet Patterson
* “Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier
* “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme
* “Nine” Colleen Atwood
* “The Young Victoria” Sandy Powell
Excellent choices. That said--and as big a Colleen Atwood fan as I am--I pegged The Young Victoria as the probable winner the moment I saw the first image from it, much the way I also pegged Marie Antoinette and The Duchess.
7) Best Animated:
* “Coraline” Henry Selick
* “Fantastic Mr. Fox” Wes Anderson
* “The Princess and the Frog” John Musker and Ron Clements
* “The Secret of Kells” Tomm Moore
* “Up” Pete Docter
GOOOOOOOOOOOO CORALINE! I'm sure this is where you come out and insist that any of the other four were better (and I did love Up--saw it twice). Coraline is just my personal, sentimental preference; I'm not making a prediction per se.
7) Miscellaneous fannish nominations: Half-Blood Prince is nominated for Cinematography, and Sherlock Holmes got in for Art Direction (read: set design) and Score, which means that a friend of mine now has an Oscar-nominated ringtone. Alexandre Desplat was nominated... for the score he did that was not for New Moon. Speaking of which, Summit Entertainment can now, if they so wish, emblazon their New Moon DVDs with "Oscar nominee Anna Kendrick." Kristen Stewart and Dakota Fanning are getting excellent performance reviews for their movies at Sundance, and if Robert Pattinson can knock one out of the park, we will have definitive evidence that, no matter how much talent you throw at these movies (and they have thrown A LOT. Why hello there, Michael Sheen and Carter Burwell), it is, in fact, Twilight itself that is an involuntary black hole of suck. I will go to the mat for this hypothesis, you wait and see.
P.S. Two reminders: the book episode (listener recommendations, plus Discworld discussion) of Made of Fail (guest: NADWCon co-runner
foresthouse!) is up; and also TONIGHT IS LOSTNESDAY.

2) Yeah, they're doing ten Best Picture nominees this year. I remember the Academy president saying, when they announced this change a few months ago, something to the effect of, "If I said this had nothing to do with The Dark Knight [not getting nominated last year], I'd be lying." So they're trying to be... more inclusive this year, because the big studios get pissed when they do put out genuinely good movies that then get snubbed in favor of blatant Oscarbait that doesn't really hold up a few years later. (Remember a couple of years ago on Extras, when Ricky Gervais told Kate Winslet that she'd need to play a Nazi if she actually wanted to win?)
3) THE BLIND SIDE FOR BEST PICTURE, WHAT THE FUCK?
A conversation I just had with my mother, who loves Sandra Bullock (aw, she's nice) and football (GRARRRRR):
"THE BLIND SIDE? WHAT."
"Well, when that many people see a movie..."
"But that doesn't mean it's GOOD."
"It IS good."
"You don't know! You didn't see it!"
"I saw enough of it!"
"ON COMMERCIALS!"
I'm going to take her to see it and we're going to settle this bullshit for once and for all.
ETA: As Roger Ebert notes, if you match up Best Director nominations to Best Picture, you get the five "real" nominees: Avatar, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, Precious and Up in the Air. Bear in mind, though, that even when we had only five, Director and Picture did not always match up--a movie could have really strong visual flair and yet not have the writing or acting to really make it a "best" movie. This year, though, I think it would hold true, because those five generally match the nominations from other awards we've seen this year. So, you know, maybe ten isn't so bad--movies like Up and District 9 got acknowledged, and probably would not have been otherwise--Up is, in fact, the first animated film to be nominated for Best Picture since Beauty and the Beast.
4) The Hurt Locker is coming on really strong. People have talked about what a shame it is that Jeremy Renner hasn't gotten in for a lot of acting awards previous to this (despite wails of chagrin that he should have), so for him to actually get the big-time nomination says a lot. And the movie just won the Producers Guild Award, which isn't a guarantee, but tends to be fairly predictive, as is the Directors Guild Award, which Kathryn Bigelow won this weekend--the first woman to do so. I don't know about Best Picture per se, but I would definitely put her down in your Oscar pool--particularly since James Cameron has been openly very happy for her* (they were married way, way back in the day) and they're still really friendly. There may be a thought process of, "Aw, hell, Avatar just made two billion dollars and it's now the highest-grossing movie of all time and there were all these groundbreaking effects so I guess we're supposed to give Best Director to The King of the World AGAIN--wait, he's supporting Kathryn Bigelow? Whose movie was massively, critically acclaimed? You mean we can give it to someone else who would also deserve it and he'll be happy about it? And then we also get credit for giving it to a woman for the first time? Well, HOT DAMN."
* (At the DGA ceremony, Carl Reiner--I guess he was hosting?--joked that only four people in the room weren't happy for Bigelow, who was a very popular winner--that is to say, the other four nominees. At which point Cameron apparently piped up, "Only three." AWWWW.)
5) A few surprises: District 9 came on strong (Best Picture, for real), and Maggie Gyllenhaal got a Supporting Actress nomination--shutting out both Mélanie Laurent and Diane Kruger from Inglourious Basterds (although I believe they submitted Laurent for Best Actress, and you see how well that worked out).
6) Not announced on TV: Best Costume.
* “Bright Star” Janet Patterson
* “Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier
* “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme
* “Nine” Colleen Atwood
* “The Young Victoria” Sandy Powell
Excellent choices. That said--and as big a Colleen Atwood fan as I am--I pegged The Young Victoria as the probable winner the moment I saw the first image from it, much the way I also pegged Marie Antoinette and The Duchess.
7) Best Animated:
* “Coraline” Henry Selick
* “Fantastic Mr. Fox” Wes Anderson
* “The Princess and the Frog” John Musker and Ron Clements
* “The Secret of Kells” Tomm Moore
* “Up” Pete Docter
GOOOOOOOOOOOO CORALINE! I'm sure this is where you come out and insist that any of the other four were better (and I did love Up--saw it twice). Coraline is just my personal, sentimental preference; I'm not making a prediction per se.
7) Miscellaneous fannish nominations: Half-Blood Prince is nominated for Cinematography, and Sherlock Holmes got in for Art Direction (read: set design) and Score, which means that a friend of mine now has an Oscar-nominated ringtone. Alexandre Desplat was nominated... for the score he did that was not for New Moon. Speaking of which, Summit Entertainment can now, if they so wish, emblazon their New Moon DVDs with "Oscar nominee Anna Kendrick." Kristen Stewart and Dakota Fanning are getting excellent performance reviews for their movies at Sundance, and if Robert Pattinson can knock one out of the park, we will have definitive evidence that, no matter how much talent you throw at these movies (and they have thrown A LOT. Why hello there, Michael Sheen and Carter Burwell), it is, in fact, Twilight itself that is an involuntary black hole of suck. I will go to the mat for this hypothesis, you wait and see.
P.S. Two reminders: the book episode (listener recommendations, plus Discworld discussion) of Made of Fail (guest: NADWCon co-runner
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:50 pm (UTC)I really hope The Hurt Locker wins.
Also, I reiterated what I tweeted at you, but now with correct punctuation.
Re: The Blind Side. I KNOW!!!!! I WAS LIKE, WUT? ALSO ALL CAPS!!!
See, someone who worked on that movie went to my college, so I know I'm all supposed to be proud and stuff, but....
yeah. I think it's ok. Not Best Picture, stuff, certainly. I think Invictus should have been up there, instead.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:59 pm (UTC)while I freaking love the movie
From:Re: while I freaking love the movie
From:Re: while I freaking love the movie
From:Re: while I freaking love the movie
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:54 pm (UTC)I have a an oscar nominated ring tone.
I am awake too early to add much else to this talk.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 04:26 pm (UTC)(Frand and I are talking: best part is how they look HAND-SEWN and the textiles are just...RIGHT.)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:57 pm (UTC)"My real question is this: In the trailer for Eclipse will she now get top billing?
"Academy Award Nominee Anna Kendrick, Razzie Nominees Robert Pattinson, Kristin Stewart, and Taylor Lautner."
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:01 pm (UTC)That being said, her character is my favourite in the Twilight films. She makes sense most of the time in a world of senselessness.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:00 pm (UTC)And I think you're totally right about The Young Victoria. Historical pictures always win costume.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:28 pm (UTC)And The Young Victoria isn't the only historical nominee, but it's got that Most Costumes thing going for it. When you get both quantity and quality in a nominee, it's got the best shot. I don't know--it just has the same feel to me as previous winners.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:02 pm (UTC)But I have a feeling Avatar is going to. Hmph.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:03 pm (UTC)Now would I sound like the biggest geek on earth if I said I was rooting for Carey Mulligan like mad because I still love Sally Sparrow to death? ;)
yaaaaaaaay blink!
Date: 2010-02-02 05:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:32 pm (UTC)And yeah, it is a super tough category this year. I would not be surprised if any of those three won.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:20 pm (UTC)I thought The Dark Knight was a pretty lame movie, but it did make a lot of money. In Hollywood, boffo box office = good film (no matter how crappy the film actually is).
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:25 pm (UTC)I didn't think it would get nominated for anything, so I'm pretty excited.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 04:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:29 pm (UTC)But then again it's a comic book movie...and we all know how the Academy LOVES those. By "loves" meaning "completely ignores" them. (TDK is the exception, of course)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:I was expecting at least a visual effects award for Doctor Manhattan CGI work
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 04:15 pm (UTC)littlesmall-ish movies that could", some of which are actually good, took over the hype (Precious, An Education, Up in the Air...), I guess the Academy must have thought the huge box office numbers were enough reward...(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:33 pm (UTC)Hunh.
Anyhoo. Yay Jeremy Renner!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 05:37 pm (UTC)Films that tug at your heart strings and make you think are all well and good, but I really thought Star Trek encompassed the qualities that make a great film...enough so that it would at least have gotten a nomination.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:39 pm (UTC)Although I'm really happy Up got a nod.;)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 04:49 pm (UTC)A movie that might sneak past it is "The Cove," another environmental movie. I haven't seen it, but I've heard nothing but great things about it, other than it being graphically bloody.
Oh, and notice who was shut out of the documentary nominations--Michael Moore. I guess "Capitalism: A Love Story" finally went too far over the top. And, yes, I normally root for him (see icon for why), but I'm glad he's not competing so that less well known people with better films can win.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:51 pm (UTC)The James Cameron anecdote is all the more endearing to me because the man is allegedly a cock who really enjoys antagonising everyone he comes in contact with--so, stuff about how he and the ex-wife are on good terms and he's actually rooting for her (or putting on a good show, at least) is just so lovely to me. Aww.
Do the instrumentals in the New Moon trailer come from the film's actual score? I haven't seen the film itself, but I found the trailer's score quite lovely (I think I felt the same way about Twilight's trailer, but I'm guessing for that one they'd want one of the signature tracks to get as much visibility as possible from the onset).
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 04:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 03:58 pm (UTC)Ah, oh well. Like I said, the Academy and I rarely ever agree. I'm thrilled to see the one movie I recommended like crazy get some recognition, though!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 04:06 pm (UTC)Sorry Gaiman, but no. Just no. You may have won AFP's heart, but you sure as hell bored mine to tears.
:|
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 04:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: