ALERT ALERT ALERT
Oct. 9th, 2007 07:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Full Golden Compass trailer now online. (Hey! There's Christopher Lee!) As for voices you hear in the trailer, Kristin Scott Thomas will voice Stelmaria; Kathy Bates is doing Hester, as I'd already suspected (ETA: Huh. The clip I posted the other day isn't actually in the trailer); and as for the new Iorek voice that I, for one, was not all that happy about: " 'It was a studio decision…You can understand why you would cast Ian McKellen for anything,' Weitz told us. 'But letting go of Nonso was one of the most painful experiences on this movie for me. I need to say about Nonso that he is one of the most promising and soulful young actors I have encountered in England and I’ve worked here for quite a bit now and he’s actually in the next Mike Leigh…But it was, uh, that was kind of a dark day for me. I kinda wanna go out of my way to point out how much I love Nonso’s work. And that’s that.' " It just kills me because Kathy Bates is right for Hester, and I can totally see (hear?) Kristin Scott Thomas doing Stelmaria, but... McKellen is just wrong for Iorek. I love him, but... the voice they had in the earlier trailers was just so perfect.






no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:08 am (UTC)From the "haven't read the books" point of view, I'd like to see the film in case it clues me in to whatever was going on in the book's first pages that I couldn't understand so I gave up reading. (I mean, I am going in spite of plastic, archly-aware-of-herself-acting, telegraphs-every-thought-and-motive Nicole Kidman.)
And every time (at an Order of the Phoenix showing) I see The Golden Compass preview (the long one) I just lose it (not in the good way) when that bear speaks. Is the bear the character in question with voice casting?
I may not be the right audience for this, but I want to try. Maybe the producers had similar test audience reactions, hmm?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:22 am (UTC)The thing about the books, also, is that they take place in an alternate-universe Oxford. I don't know if that helps any, but that may have been what you found disorienting.
The Kidman issue is kind of tricky--I know exactly what you're talking about, and I think she'd be a much better actress if she could shed that plastic sort of veneer, but at the same time, she's absolutely perfect for Mrs. Coulter. I think Pullman even said he had her in mind. She could stand to be a little less aware of her own acting, but Mrs. Coulter is very much a glamorous, fakey-fake, two-faced kind of woman.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:26 am (UTC)Also, what's with calling the Aleithiometer the "golden compass" in the movie's dialogue? I know it's the name of the book in America, but those words aren't ever used in the books are they?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:36 am (UTC)I can't get over how much I love Sam Elliot as Lee. Originally I didn't, I thought he was too old. But now? Total and utter love.
Also not really liking McKellen for Iorek. I love him, just not as this character.
Brief glimpse of Christopher Lee, woo!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:39 am (UTC)I have no real opinion of Iorek's voice. I liked the first one they had in the other trailer, but then again I love Ian McKellen way to much that whatever part he would have in this movie would make me happy.
I guess I am going to have to get off my bum and go re-read the books sooner than later. I have not read them in about 4 or 5 years, though I got my high school aged brother into the series last year and he loved them^_^
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:02 am (UTC)What's with everyone calling it the golden compass? I hope they haven't completely lost the term "alethiometer." They used it in the first trailer!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 03:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:11 am (UTC)But other than that, I'm still looking forward to this one! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:30 am (UTC)Aside from that one point, I'm on board so far.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:47 am (UTC)Indeed, when I saw the trailer for the film before OotP this summer I thought it looked like it was going to be gorgeous. In fact, I just rewatched that trailer and it still excites me. Ok, some of it is the editing (I'm such a sucker for editing, especially in trailers and adverts). But still. It looks pretty, it looks compelling and you just get little snippets of the story.
This new one though... it seriously needs to lose the 45 seconds of exposition from the front. And this is coming from somebody who, as I say, hasn't read the books. In fact I don't think I know anything more about the plot than that it's got a little girl called Lyra, it's set in Oxford somehow and everyone has an animal spirit guide doodad. And it's anti-religion in some fashion. And I still say they need to lose the exposition. It should start at the New Line logo. It makes me worry that the exposition could be as clunky in the film itself.
Or possibly the narrator just needs a deeper voice, the timbre isn't quite right and it's unsettling.
Also, ice bear? Is that from the books? I know that a lot of European languages polar bears are called ice bears, thus the phrase in English always reminds me of slightly careless translations, false friends and the like. As a consequence, I cannot take it seriously in English. Of course stick it into a German context and I'm more than happy (since to English ears at least Eisbär is virtually the same).
I still don't understand why it's being marketed as The Golden Compass in the UK. It's moronic. When adapting a highly successful book with good name recognition, surely it makes sense to call the film the same thing. It's as stupid as marketing in the US as The Northern Lights, surely.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 03:14 am (UTC)In the books, the bears, by the way, are called Panserbjørne or, literally, "armored bears." I don't know that I've ever heard "ice bear" in a Dark Materials context before.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:51 am (UTC)Thanks to your linkspam I found out about the screening and since I've recently moved to NYC I was so there. Although not many other people were. The place didn't have many people and, at least in my corner, most of those there were tourists who had just wandered off the street. Sam Elliot talked for about 30 seconds. And I didn't even win the tickets to the premier. Bummer. I did act like a total ham and did an interview with MTV though. Shameless, utterly shameless.
And even though the rain sucked it did start right at the climax of the trailer which was kind of cool.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 03:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 03:19 am (UTC)I agree... But who knows, it may just work. *crosses fingers harder*
BTW...Guess what I just saw (http://dcmoviegirl.blogspot.com/2007/10/elizabeth-golden-age.html), tonight?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 03:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 05:33 am (UTC)Did you hear that they're changing the ending (http://www.canmag.com/nw/9214-golden-compass-ending) (sort of), though? I'm not sure how I feel about that.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 05:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 08:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 10:43 am (UTC)Of course, I'll still see it no matter how much the trailer makes me cringe. Half the time the bad trailered movies are better than the films with good ones.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 01:04 pm (UTC)I honestly don't remember the original voice of Iorek; I know I'll be thinking of the voice actor in the full-cast audiobook who played him and thinking no one will measure up, so, I'm working hard on letting that go. That's probably why I'll never be able to see anyone other than Natasha Richardson as Mrs. Coulter, as she read the abridged audiobook of The Golden Compass. Nicole Kidman looks wrong wrong wrong to me, but I imagine that's just me.
And a side plea--may I have, from this point on, fantasy stories that contain no prophecies or destinies, ever? Prophecies are the dreadful McGuffens of fantasy and I want them mocked as cliche for the rest of my life. Yes, His Dark Materials is still fabulous despite that, but, come on. Make characters do s**t without copping out on prophecies.
The witches do look amazing. Spot-on.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 07:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:12 pm (UTC)Again I find myself in agreement with Wil Wheaton - a big name does not neccessarily equal a better voice actor performance.
In regards to the naming of the bears... Panzerbjorn did make me think of tanks... but I'm a tank nerd. I don't think it's an unapt name though, they are in their own way the tanks of their world - big, powerful, and they tend to send the foot soldiers scrambling for cover.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 05:29 pm (UTC)I love the image morph, but its also interesting to look at in terms of what the film industry has seen as beautiful throughout the ages.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 07:46 pm (UTC)But Kathy Bates as Hester, oh yeah :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 08:08 pm (UTC)