One final thought on The Seeker, if only because I finally thought of a way to summarize my problem with the movie: It's not the presence of changes that made the movie bad. It's that the kind of changes they made indicate that they're not good filmmakers in the first place, or (at the very least) not the right filmmakers for the project. Someone who genuinely thinks that "Googling light and dark" or "buying a Sign from a mall kiosk" is a good idea is probably not going to make a very good movie, is all I'm saying. Look at my other pet example, Stardust : a number of changes were made, but they indicated an understanding of what people want from and enjoy in a movie (example: a less bittersweet ending. And subverting fantasy tropes with anticlimax is great and all, but in a movie, you really do need some kind of showdown with the witch) while keeping as much of the original story as possible. I'm not saying it was a perfect movie, but (in my opinion) the people involved seemed to both 1) like the original material and 2) know what they were doing. Whereas the Dark Is Rising people complained (with reason!) that the original book was very internal and introspective--but rather than find a way to translate those scenes into action, they had Will running around a mall. A MALL. Here's what malls and Googling gets you: Ben Stiller's grown-up comedy ''The Heartbreak Kid'' flops. Buried in the article: "The Kingdom held strong at No. 3 with $9.3 mil and Resident Evil: Extinction stayed alive in fourth place with $4.3 mil, while the fantasy flick The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising (No. 5) flopped with a mere $3.7 mil." There's a lesson here. I just hope the studio figures out what it is.
Meanwhile, I spent yesterday reading Alcott's Rose in Bloom for fun (it's one of those favorite books I tend to go back to just for comfort, although you definitely have to suspend a modern perspective, or you'll start screaming when [spoilers?]one character gives up a career for The Man She Loves, and another dies for the Horrible Sin of Stumbling Home Drunk on New Year's Day) and a ton of documents at victorianlondon.org--I don't know why I ever doubt that that site will have exactly what I need, because it solved several problems I was having with hotel dining, dinner parties, servant duties, and Death in the Household, as one helpful article was called.
Two requests and a bunch of linkspam from y'all, from the Raiders of the Lost Ark warehouse that is my inbox:
From
starlady42: "Cleo, if you get a chance, could you pimp http://www.asbrand.com/? This is a friend of mine who is trying to navigate the nightmare that is the US government's permanent resident (green card) process for his wife and daughter. All the details are on his site -- they've been jerked around by the bureaucracy several times already, and are running out of time and money. Any help would be greatly appreciated."
From
golden_d: "I was wondering if you might be interested in Operation Find Don for your linkspam? Don appears most importantly in this essay written by Sarah Bunting of TWOP fame in mid-September 2001. It's the kind of thing that could really use some plugging. Thanks!" I actually want to say that I've linked to OFD before--way, way back in the day when Sars first posted about it. And she still hasn't found the guy? Wow.
From
etherealshores: "Miss Cleo! I have found the most amazing Halloween-type music ever: www.noxarcana.com. Seriously, check these guys out. They are amazing."
From
bandersnatch42: "Did you see Viggo Mortenson's surprise cameo on The Colbert Report? It was made of awesome."
From
elendiari22: "I have a steampunk book I thought I'd recommend to you: The Haunting of Alaizabel Cray. It's set in Victorian-esque London and it's really creepy and riveting."
From
maetang: "No human sacrifice in term time, please. Glen David Gold on the impishness that inspired his novel Carter Beats the Devil."
From
edda: "DID YOU KNOW THERE'S SUCH A THING AS A GOBLIN SHARK? BECAUSE THERE IS. Because I HAD to Google them from that link you gave me. Holy effin' snotballs, I'm gonna have nightmares now."
From
rahrahmah: How to Write a Book. "Do not postpone other projects so that you can focus on the current one. It’s better to spread yourself so thin that you produce an evenly distributed amount of complete crap.... If you’ve gotten this far without a single technical foul-up, now’s a good time to download something viral.... If one of your cowriters is something of an optimist, shit in his hat."
Hmm. I think I'll save the linkspam proper for later, rather than overwhelm everyone now.

Meanwhile, I spent yesterday reading Alcott's Rose in Bloom for fun (it's one of those favorite books I tend to go back to just for comfort, although you definitely have to suspend a modern perspective, or you'll start screaming when [spoilers?]one character gives up a career for The Man She Loves, and another dies for the Horrible Sin of Stumbling Home Drunk on New Year's Day) and a ton of documents at victorianlondon.org--I don't know why I ever doubt that that site will have exactly what I need, because it solved several problems I was having with hotel dining, dinner parties, servant duties, and Death in the Household, as one helpful article was called.
Two requests and a bunch of linkspam from y'all, from the Raiders of the Lost Ark warehouse that is my inbox:
From
From
From
From
From
From
From
From
Hmm. I think I'll save the linkspam proper for later, rather than overwhelm everyone now.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 09:41 pm (UTC)who was so totally destined for Rose from the moment she started taking care of him in Eight Cousins.no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 08:37 pm (UTC)Die, DiR. Die painfully, and may unworthy careers die with you.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 09:22 pm (UTC)I dearly love the Incredible Shame of One Night's Revelry. You'd think he'd gone to Vegas, boinked Britney on the dance floor, then did lines of coke on the counter in the police station.
I still love LMA - you just utterly cannot read it while holding any kind of feminist perspective. The ironic thing is that some of the things she advocated then were deemed feminist - in the prequel to RIB, she has the temerity to suggest that women should *gasp* NOT WEAR CORSETS! And she puts Rose in a "Bloomer Suit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victorian_dress_reform#The_bloomer_suit)" to the horror of the aunts.
Have you read "An Old-Fashioned Girl"?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 09:51 pm (UTC)I actually love Eight Cousins as well, but Rose in Bloom (which I only discovered a few years ago, and downloaded from Project Gutenberg) may have become my new favorite because of the romance. I love Mac, what can I say. I'm also the girl who picks up Jane Eyre just to reread the angsty Rochester parts occasionally, so... there you are.
(I have the e-book of An Old-Fashioned Girl but I haven't read it yet. Is it connected to any of her other books? I'm also dying to find a more comprehensive collection of her blood-and-thunder stories than the one I have--Behind a Mask, which only has four stories in it. I read a fantastic old book from the UAB library that had tons, but I can't remember the title or find anything comparable. Do you know of a good one?)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 09:58 pm (UTC)And yes - Rose is atypical. The horror of her not wanting to "preserve the money"!
OMG I totally forgot about Fun See. And his father. And how they think Anabelle will be eating puppies and laugh about it.
And of course, the fact that Phebe is allowed to study at ALL, when she should totally have been left as the poor little
matchservant girl, not elevated to Rose's status - the class assumptions, etc. That kind of thing is in Lucy Maud Montgomery's works, as well - the horror of a 'foundling' marrying into good blood, etc. I have to remind myself that they assumed back then that "blood will tell" and that the child of a thief will be a thief, etc.Old-fashioned Girl is self-contained.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 10:12 pm (UTC)And I did figure out the name of the book I read--it was Louisa May Alcott Unmasked, although Amazon only has it secondhand through outside sellers now. And the cover is tacky. But for $2, what more can you possibly ask for?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 10:19 pm (UTC)Hey, a $2 book is NEVER a bad thing. (Says she who often will go to one second-hand vendor a buy a bunch of 25 cent books just to make the order amount = the shipping cost :D)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 11:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 04:18 am (UTC)I remember reading Eight Cousins and then Rose in Bloom they were my very first "real people" books that weren't about animals or fables. I adored them totally and I remember crying and crying over Poor Charlie.
Later on when I found out what "earbobs" were I was indignant that anyone would insist Rose give them up. I suspect however, that Alcott helped plant the begining of a budding feminist in me back in the early sixties before anyone else in my family even thought out of sync with the world and "womens's place"
I wonder if I will be charmed reading them again after all this time...
no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 10:12 pm (UTC)http://portal.omegacon.us/index.php
I've kinda pimped you to the President of the organization by mailing him links to your journals because of your wonderful Movies in Fifteen Minutes.
He also said since I told him of what you do that they need judges for the independent films still. He would like to hear from you they are doing Boo at the Zoo or email him.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 10:16 pm (UTC)Hehe. Riveting. Steampunk. I'm amused. ^_^
And also adding the book to my to-read list, if course.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-07 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 01:09 am (UTC)none really
Date: 2007-10-09 05:16 am (UTC)Re: none really
Date: 2007-10-09 05:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 03:25 am (UTC)You mentioned a BPAL update in your LJ, I asked you about it, you gave me answers...
a little more than a month later, I'm a bona fide BPAL addict. Just bloody fantastic. :-P
OMG, I love this stuff. Yesterday, a lab order (Pirate Moon!), an eBay order, and a forum order all came in the mail for me. I about flipped when I came home from work, and spent the next few hours in ecstasy.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 10:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 05:49 pm (UTC)That's fantastic advice for ANY writer (or self-proclaimed "writer"), regardless of book deals or lack thereof. Especially for poets.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 09:42 pm (UTC)P.S. I've always had a bit of a crush on Mac. Probably because he's "young Uncle Alec." Come to think of it, I seem to recall thinking once that it's a wee bit kinky how Rose falls for Mac because he's the most like Alec...like she has a bit of a crush on her uncle. But then, who doesn't?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:42 am (UTC)I totally had a crush on him when I read the books, though, so he shouldn't feel too bad. ;)
P.S. Love the ghosty background!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 02:19 am (UTC)Crap seeks its own level?