Madeleine L'Engle (1918 – 2007)
Sep. 7th, 2007 03:24 pmMadeleine L'Engle dies at the age of 88. I happened to check Fandom Lounge, saw this, and my mouth fell open for some reason. I loved L'Engle, although I haven't gotten through half as many books as I'd like. I even saw her speak when I was in seventh or eighth grade (which must have been in the neighborhood of 1992-1993); I was a library aide at school, and the librarians took all of us to see her when she was in town. I want to say she spoke in a church, because I seem to remember sitting with the other aides in a balcony. I was surprised by how she looked--like a very cheerful energetic grandmother, a grandmother who might go climb a mountain when she was finished with her speaking engagement. In fact, I think she talked about penguins and the Antarctic, and I notice that some ten years after that, Penguins and Golden Calves: Icons and Idols in Antarctica and other Spiritual Places was published.
For some reason, A Swiftly Tilting Planet was my favorite book in the Time Quartet as a kid--yes, over A Wrinkle in Time and A Wind in the Door, although I loved the covers of all my copies--but A Ring of Endless Light was probably my favorite overall. I remember reading it one bright summer, a summer that "Red Red Wine" was on the radio all the time (although really, that could be many different summers), and I always associate the two. If I'm reading the book, I hear the song; if I hear the song, I think of the book, and that light, white afternoon I finished it in my little upstairs room with the roof shaped like a barn's.
Just something to leave you with, from that news link:

For some reason, A Swiftly Tilting Planet was my favorite book in the Time Quartet as a kid--yes, over A Wrinkle in Time and A Wind in the Door, although I loved the covers of all my copies--but A Ring of Endless Light was probably my favorite overall. I remember reading it one bright summer, a summer that "Red Red Wine" was on the radio all the time (although really, that could be many different summers), and I always associate the two. If I'm reading the book, I hear the song; if I hear the song, I think of the book, and that light, white afternoon I finished it in my little upstairs room with the roof shaped like a barn's.
Just something to leave you with, from that news link:
"In my dreams, I never have an age," she said. "I never write for any age group in mind. When people do, they tend to be tolerant and condescending and they don't write as well as they can write. When you underestimate your audience, you're cutting yourself off from your best work."It's probably not the most profound thing a very profound writer ever said, but I believe it.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 10:56 pm (UTC)What do you mean by plot twist? I'm wondering if I missed something *facepalm*
no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:51 pm (UTC)Really, what set her apart from most authors was that she sort of transcended genres. It was sci-fi, yes, and fantasy and everything in between, and just so insightful, more than what you'd expect to find in books that are usually shelved among fluffy teen fiction. She really seemed to get it.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 09:57 pm (UTC):(
This makes me very, very sad.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 10:20 pm (UTC)I'm sitting here with tears running down my face. Is it silly to love someone you've never met, who's never met you? Because I loved -- love -- Madeleine L'Engle.
I think I was nine when I first read A Wrinkle in Time (I am seventeen now), and I remember being incredibly moved by it in a way that I had never been moved by a book before. It felt important. It felt real. It had a weight that no other book I had previously read had carried. I have worn my copy nearly to pieces, reading it and re-reading it in the years since. Later I read some of her other books for children (the rest of the Time Quartet, some of the Austin books), and loved them, because they were beautiful, because they had that weight, and that joy, and because she is one of the only writers I have encountered who can write about God in the frame of a novel organically and beautifully and eloquently, without it feeling like a bit of lace frill sewn on at the end.
There are some writers, you know, whom you love to read, and maybe you live in their books sometimes, and maybe they mean something -- but then there are other writers whose writings are bits of you -- they're writers of your heart and they get into your soul and take roost there gently and irrevocably, and something about them is like being home, except it's a home you didn't know was home and it turns out it's more widely and fully home than the house you're living in. For me, she was one of those.
This spring, I happened upon a book of hers at the Goodwill. I knew vaguely that she'd written some non-fiction, but I'd never read any of it. The book was Two-Part Invention, the story of her marriage to Hugh Franklin. I bought it and took it home and read it, and I have never been quite the same since. I was so deeply -- oh, moved isn't even the word at all. I was very very quiet for a long time, and then I went out and took a walk. I wrote on my LiveJournal,
"The thoughts, the ideas, the stories and pains and joys and how L'Engle writes about them and what she writes about them -- it's the sort of book that one has to recover from afterwards; you come out of it slowly, blinking at the brightness of the light, and you are very, very quiet for a few minutes afterwards, because you don't want to leave it, and because you have so much to ponder and to understand. I sat very still, wanting to know that kind of love, and that kind of trust, and faith, and strength, and wanting to be able to make others feel them as if the sorrows and joys belonged to them -- if I can't do that, then I can't be a writer. I took a walk. It's Spring, as you have no doubt heard, and I love early evening, all pale and sharp-smelling and quiet and still, so I walked around the neighbourhood in the chilly March air and thought, not just about what I'd read, but everything, everything that there was to think of."
Since then, Madeleine L'Engle has been real to me (and she has been making God real and beautiful to me through her books). I discovered her novels for adults, and have been attempting to make my way through her entire bibliography. Aside from her "Crosswicks Journals", the four-part autobiographical sort-of series which concluded with Two-Part Invention, I've especially loved The Other Side of the Sun and Certain Women so far.
I only wish I could have met her on this earth. See you in heaven, Madeleine.
(I have always loved A Swiftly Tilting Planet in particular, too -- all those intertwining stories, and the Welsh. But each of her books that I have read has felt incredibly personal to me, in some odd way; it's difficult to choose favourites because they all mean something and they all managed to get into some corner of my consciousness and being and alter it.)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 03:57 am (UTC):(
Date: 2007-09-07 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 10:47 pm (UTC)I'm sad to hear about her passing, but I hope she can filter some of her genius down to those of us back on Earth.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 10:52 pm (UTC)A Swiftly Tilting Planet was my favourite in that series too.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 11:06 pm (UTC)It's a pity she's gone.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 11:30 pm (UTC)She was a truly amazing, talented woman, and I loved that she saw her work as a reflection--an outgrowth, really--of her faith. Proof that you can write spiritually without writing dogmatically.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-07 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 05:36 am (UTC)One of her books had an interesting sort of diagram of the families and their connections through her fiction books (Canon Tallis, Adam, and Zachary).
no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 06:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 12:31 am (UTC)I love "Swiftly Tilting Planet" as well- I think because it shows that you have to keep on fighting for something, even when it seems like it won't matter because the world is going to end.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 12:43 am (UTC)As much as I loved those three books my favorites were A Ring of Endless Light and The Arm of the Starfish.
She will be missed.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 12:58 am (UTC)Also, seriously, a unicorn named Gaudior! A trip into the past involving squabbling Welsh princes (including one who supposedly sailed into Mobile Bay in the 12th century)! More Charles Wallace! It's made of win.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 02:33 am (UTC)(I have to say I was a bit amused that the reporting post over at Jezebel (http://jezebel.com/) eventually turned into a discussion of how hot we all found Sandy and Dennys in reading Many Waters as pre-teens.)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 03:56 am (UTC)Her books are timeless. I reread "A Swiftly Tilting Planet" the days after September 11th and even though it had been written in the 1970s she could have been writing about 2001.
"A Ring of Endless Light" is my absolute favorite. But I always loved Vicky and Adam best.
I was lucky enough to meet her twice. We talked about Vicky. "A House Like a Lotus" was originally supposed to be about Vicky, not Polly. But her husband convinced her it had to be Polly's story.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 06:28 am (UTC)Anyhoo- if you read this, thanks for caring about my mindless, unedited outpouring of feelings.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 02:41 pm (UTC)I hope you won't find it disrespectful for me to say this in this entry, but on a completely unrelated note: I went and saw Stardust last night and it was brillant. Absolute pure movie genius. I haven't read the book (yet! I got a copy! Though I don't think it has any illustrations. Wasn't there something about it's supposed to have illustrations?) but I loved the movie 100%. I think this might now be tied with The Holiday for The Only Movie That Makes EVERYTHING Better.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-08 05:45 pm (UTC)