TONNER HOLIDAY RELEASES
Aug. 11th, 2010 05:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
SHIT. I totally forgot they were announcing this today. Fall/Holiday 2010 at Tonner:
Lord of the Rings: Legolas. What in the sweet name of Eru.

I just... it's like the Galadriel likeness is spectacular, and the Arwen one is pretty good from certain angles (and Noel Cruz's repaint is fantastic), and then... there's the guy dolls. I don't even know. It looks like they're reusing their Orlando Bloom likeness from the POTC line, and I didn't like it there, either. It's like... the head (see the profile shot) is just not shaped right, and the features need to take up more space on the face. I just... I know exactly how it's wrong, I just can't articulate it.
As always, though, the costume itself looks fantastically made.
And there's the Galadriel, but we've already covered that one.
Harry Potter: Aw, smaller 12" dolls! They're scale compatible with Lyra now! I am intrigued. The Ron is actually really great, IMO. I've seen the Hermione (pictures from convention displays), and I liked the 12" sculpt a lot better than the full-size doll. If I can find those convention pictures, I'll link them. Also: MCGONAGALL. Given the limitations of doll sculpting (wrinkles don't turn out too well)... they didn't do a half-bad job on that one.
Firefly: Zoe figure announced, no picture yet.
Alice in Wonderland: The White Rabbit.
DC Stars: New sculpt for Wonder Woman (no picture yet) and Supergirl. (Huh. I had not seen the Power Girl before.)
Gone with the Wind: The blue portrait gown.
The Wizard of Oz: They've been doing wacky shit (Exhibit A) (I say this lovingly) with this property for a couple of years now. I kind of like the Scarecrow girl doll, actually.
Anne Harper: Another Old Hollywood original character line (like their DeeAnna Denton, as opposed to the licensed Joan Crawford and Bette Davis dolls). There is clearly a lot of love put into their Hollywood-inspired lines.
The Princess Diaries. What? Now? I mean, I know Robert Tonner loves Anne Hathaway, but ...wow, the Julie Andrews likeness is kind of startling.
I'm not seeing anything new on the Twilight line (which is, after all, theoretically Relevant to the Interests of the Shelfians) I heard they were working on a Jasper doll, but--my hand to God--"were having trouble with the hair." NO KIDDING.

Lord of the Rings: Legolas. What in the sweet name of Eru.

I just... it's like the Galadriel likeness is spectacular, and the Arwen one is pretty good from certain angles (and Noel Cruz's repaint is fantastic), and then... there's the guy dolls. I don't even know. It looks like they're reusing their Orlando Bloom likeness from the POTC line, and I didn't like it there, either. It's like... the head (see the profile shot) is just not shaped right, and the features need to take up more space on the face. I just... I know exactly how it's wrong, I just can't articulate it.
As always, though, the costume itself looks fantastically made.
And there's the Galadriel, but we've already covered that one.
Harry Potter: Aw, smaller 12" dolls! They're scale compatible with Lyra now! I am intrigued. The Ron is actually really great, IMO. I've seen the Hermione (pictures from convention displays), and I liked the 12" sculpt a lot better than the full-size doll. If I can find those convention pictures, I'll link them. Also: MCGONAGALL. Given the limitations of doll sculpting (wrinkles don't turn out too well)... they didn't do a half-bad job on that one.
Firefly: Zoe figure announced, no picture yet.
Alice in Wonderland: The White Rabbit.
DC Stars: New sculpt for Wonder Woman (no picture yet) and Supergirl. (Huh. I had not seen the Power Girl before.)
Gone with the Wind: The blue portrait gown.
The Wizard of Oz: They've been doing wacky shit (Exhibit A) (I say this lovingly) with this property for a couple of years now. I kind of like the Scarecrow girl doll, actually.
Anne Harper: Another Old Hollywood original character line (like their DeeAnna Denton, as opposed to the licensed Joan Crawford and Bette Davis dolls). There is clearly a lot of love put into their Hollywood-inspired lines.
The Princess Diaries. What? Now? I mean, I know Robert Tonner loves Anne Hathaway, but ...wow, the Julie Andrews likeness is kind of startling.
I'm not seeing anything new on the Twilight line (which is, after all, theoretically Relevant to the Interests of the Shelfians) I heard they were working on a Jasper doll, but--my hand to God--"were having trouble with the hair." NO KIDDING.


no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:23 pm (UTC)that ick..urgh
From:Re: that ick..urgh
From:Re: that ick..urgh
From:(no subject)
From:orlando bloom..kind of
From:Re: orlando bloom..kind of
From:Re: orlando bloom..kind of
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:more reason for eww
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:10 pm (UTC)I need the internets to shut down now so I don't do something foolish involving my VISA card.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:10 pm (UTC)The Luna Lovegood likeness is amazing. But why do all the dolls look like bobbleheads?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:21 pm (UTC)Wow, the basic Draco looks a lot better either than it did, or than I remember it.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:26 pm (UTC)http://tonnerdoll.com/2009TonnerSite/2009fh/HP/luciusmalfoy.jpg
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:25 pm (UTC)That said, the ickle wickle Harry and Ron are adorable! I covet them.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Seems strangely... familiar.
From:He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:Re: He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:Re: He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:Re: He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:Re: He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:Re: He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:Re: He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:Re: He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:(no subject)
From:Re: He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:Re: He looks like an escapee from the Cullen Ranch.
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:30 pm (UTC)Someone needs to grab the Orlando sculpt off of the Hot Toys doll and show the folks at Tonner.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:31 pm (UTC)So we're all agreed that Tonner Does Not Do Male Faces Well?
From:Re: So we're all agreed that Tonner Does Not Do Male Faces Well?
From:Re: So we're all agreed that Tonner Does Not Do Male Faces Well?
From:Re: So we're all agreed that Tonner Does Not Do Male Faces Well?
From:Re: So we're all agreed that Tonner Does Not Do Male Faces Well?
From:Re: So we're all agreed that Tonner Does Not Do Male Faces Well?
From:Re: So we're all agreed that Tonner Does Not Do Male Faces Well?
From:Re: So we're all agreed that Tonner Does Not Do Male Faces Well?
From:Arwen, and random question
Date: 2010-08-11 10:39 pm (UTC)So, I am not a doll person (though some of the Tonner lines are weirdly tempting....)- may I ask - why do they often have the body sculpt as part of the description (like, "Tyler body" or what have you)? Is that relevant for like, what outfits they can wear, or how they are standing - I mean, I can see that each body would not be unique, but why is that something that they include in the description to possible buyers?
I know that's odd, but I'm just curious. Yay dolls!
Re: Arwen, and random question
Date: 2010-08-11 10:48 pm (UTC)Re: Arwen, and random question
From:Re: Arwen, and random question
From:Re: Arwen, and random question
From:Re: Arwen, and random question
From:Re: Arwen, and random question
From:Re: Arwen, and random question
From:Re: Arwen, and random question
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:41 pm (UTC)Is it weird that I actually think the female Scarecrow doll is awesome? They do such odd stuff with Oz, anyway, that this is at least new and original, and she's cool looking. Not sure I'm sold on the Tin Man or Lion, however.
The Princess Diaries baffles me. Will there even be a market for those anywhere? The gowns are lovely but wasn't that movie made ten years ago? I feel like I was 13 when it came out. And even then, I wouldn't have been terribly interested in a Princess Mia doll.
I just saw the Tonner Alice doll and...I really dislike her. It's so disappointing! They could have done a much better job, and Barbie made her prettier and much more accurate (especially the hair).
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 11:07 pm (UTC)And yeah, I threw a (facetious) tantrum* here over the Tonner Alice. If only it was the Tonner equivalent of the Barbie! Which was precious! Except that I want a Tonner-sized Alice! Dammit.
* Facetious Tantrum is totally the name of my new band.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 10:52 pm (UTC)Also the body proportions look off (though I understand that's harder to futz with than a head sculpt). Maybe it's the loosish clothing but he doesn't look nearly as tall and skinny as he should. The tenth Doctor, however, is appropriately gangly so we know it's possible.
eep! the harry potter dolls! *squee!... sad*
Date: 2010-08-11 11:05 pm (UTC)Also MCGONAGALL!!!! I Would LOVE to be able to her so she could share the shelf with my Harris!Dumbledore.
but urgh... So more expensive than my spending quota allows ;(
*does anyone knows if the price decreases a little over time? or a place where, after the initial release, I can get them cheaper?
im not sure on one thing.. 12" is small or big?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 12:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 12:12 am (UTC)I can't get the Princess Diary link to work.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 12:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 12:20 am (UTC)No, that's ACTUALLY CONTINUITY.
...
Date: 2010-08-12 04:38 am (UTC)You know what... Forget I asked. That genre can get really bonkers.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 12:49 am (UTC)Seriously. Those itty bitty features on that big ol' face make him look bloated.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 02:03 am (UTC)