WHAT THE HELL
Jul. 3rd, 2010 09:32 amSo I get a tearful message from
snowcoma this morning:
WHAT THE SHIT.
I am pretty sure that an angry mob is not going to convince a foster family that someone is more suitable for cat ownership. I am also pretty sure that catnapping is illegal. I just don't know what to do. Keep in mind that Edward Cat isn't even at the foster family's house, as I understand it--he's all alone at the pet store--
--while the foster family is somewhere on the phone all like NO CAT FOR YOU.
I am not understanding what the problem is here.
ETA: Okay, we have figured out that Edward Cat comes from a private/volunteer rescue, not the Humane Society, and a deeply-attached foster family really may have the final say. (And now you know why he's been in that window forever.) My problem with this is that
snowcoma was cleared to take Edward home at least once, and they keep giving her this runaround of "We'll have to talk to you/her/someone else, we'll call later" and then it takes days. If you don't want her to have the cat, don't tell her she can have the cat.
ETA: HOPEFUL UPDATE

There has been yet another snag in getting Edward. I went to the store today with my carrier, his new collar and toy, and....waited. And waited. When they finally got his foster mom on the phone she had YET MORE questions she wanted to talk with my mom about (despite discussing the same things with me the night before and giving me the all-clear). As of ten o'clock this night, my mother hasn't heard from her.
Did I mention we are leaving for Vancouver, WA [this] morning to SEE my mother? And that I am supposed to have a cat for her?
[snowcoma talks a little bit about panic and anxiety attacks here, which are something I can sadly identify with.] Add in the fact that I am now attached to an animal that someone is playing paperwork keep-away with, and well...
All I want to do is get the damn cat and visit my mother. I ended up crying in the middle of the pet store (and the employees were extremely nice, this is just out of their control). One of them even offered to let me pick him up before the store even opens if I can get the all clear.
You can share any or all of this, because this is goddamn ridiculous. And I feel like I'm letting a lot of people down every time I fail to bring him home. I'm sitting here with an empty collar in my hands and trying not to cry.
WHAT THE SHIT.
I am pretty sure that an angry mob is not going to convince a foster family that someone is more suitable for cat ownership. I am also pretty sure that catnapping is illegal. I just don't know what to do. Keep in mind that Edward Cat isn't even at the foster family's house, as I understand it--he's all alone at the pet store--
--while the foster family is somewhere on the phone all like NO CAT FOR YOU.
I am not understanding what the problem is here.
ETA: Okay, we have figured out that Edward Cat comes from a private/volunteer rescue, not the Humane Society, and a deeply-attached foster family really may have the final say. (And now you know why he's been in that window forever.) My problem with this is that
ETA: HOPEFUL UPDATE
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:37 pm (UTC)All sympathies and best wishes to
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:00 pm (UTC)I think that the problem can become the fact that people who work for rescues, including fosters, being exposed over and over again to how badly people treat their pets. And "badly" has a wide set of extremes, from outright abuse of the worst sort, to "we owned this cat for 8 years but then we got a dog and the cat wanted too much attention so we gave up the cat", which, you know... WTF, people? Or you get a cat like mine, who is the sweetest cat in the entire world, whom someone owned for a year and then abandoned on a university campus because... why? We'll never know. Why didn't you have the balls to even take her to a shelter? The guilt too much for you? So it's so much better to just turn her loose to fend for herself?
So, yeah. I'm not even speaking AS someone who does rescue or fostering, and I get mad at irresponsible owners. I think what can happen, though, is that the longer you deal with that, the more you might get into a mindset of NOBODY IS GOOD ENOUGH. Right? Except for the rescues themselves and those who work with them to foster. Those folks obviously "get it". They get what people do to animals -- even people who start off with "good intentions", and then a year later or whatever it's suddenly "too hard", or they have to move and it's too much effort to find a new place that will take cats, and the cat is bounced back to a shelter if he's LUCKY. Or, you know, you adopt a cat out to an older person and they die, and then it's up to the family to provide for the cat, and what if the extended family doesn't care? This is a serious issue. (My friends and I all have had "will you take our cats if we die suddenly?" talks, because it's a real fear.)
And what I'm saying is... I think that some rescues and fosters get into this mindset and that's why they become over-protective and fall into this seemingly un-intuitive pattern of not adopting out a cat to a good home. It's because they've become paranoid about people and they have a really hard time distinguishing what a "good home" is in their view. And that's before you even add in the problem that there are widely differing and strong opinions about what "proper" levels of care are for pets. (And I tend to have this feeling that the folks who go into rescue/fostering are folks with quite high standards of pet care, which means if you have a more "relaxed" attitude, woe to you trying to convince them that you are a "good home" for the pet.)
Note: I mean all of this as maybe-explanatory. Not as an excuse. My opinion tends to be that I get where that paranoia/pessimism comes from, but... I also think it's off the deep end of good judgement. The only way to feel like you can absolutely control what happens to a pet in the future is to keep it yourself, which is counter to the goal of adopting out pets to good homes.
I'm in agreement with the poster below who suggested trying to call the rescue itself. I also don't get why the foster-family is getting to call the shots, here. On the one hand, yes: attached. On the other: gave up the cat for him to sit in a pet-store, of all things.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:40 pm (UTC)It's starting to sound to me as if this so called foster is trying to keep the cat for themselves.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:40 pm (UTC)WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE?
Date: 2010-07-03 02:42 pm (UTC)HULK SMASH STUPIDITY.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:45 pm (UTC)Just give him to snowcoma already foster family! He can't take much more of this!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:46 pm (UTC)I am very irritated. And my cat meowed at the screen at the fluffiest Edward.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:46 pm (UTC)Also, I had no idea how irritating the adoption process was until now. I went with my Mom to get a cat a while ago, and I was so excited to take it home that day. Well, no. They wanted to check out our house to see if it was a suitable environment! They had to do a background check with the vet and everything. Mind you, our house usually consists of two great danes and two to three cats.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:57 pm (UTC)Seriously, I am having a bad time of it right now because I am taking the bar exam in 28 days and every time I see that picture of Edward Cat I burst into tears, and I just wanted poor Mr. Edward Kitty to go home with the nice lady, and I am clearly way too invested in all of this.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:58 pm (UTC)Yes, I understand you want the animal to go to a good home, but can't you KEEP THEM YOURSELF until you have painstakingly interviewed all persons and found the ideal human for them? :P
I mean I know you want the animal to be well-treated but it is a FREAKING CAT. Unless the animal is being actively tortured or denied basic needs, they'll probably be fine. 9_9 Then again, I come from an area where people still drown kittens in the river. >>; Which I do not condone, but I DO agree that EddyCat's former mama is being a big neurotic over this whole biz.
Good luck and all of that. :\
cutest cat ever
Date: 2010-07-03 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:07 pm (UTC)It makes adopting animals so frustrating.
I hope Edward gets to go home soon.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:09 pm (UTC)The foster family gets to raise the cat or cats. Period. They get no opinion. They have no rights. Theft is against the law. The cats don't belong to them.
Report these people and get the cat. After hearing about this the agency probably won't let them foster or adopt cats ever again. It's not their call.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:09 pm (UTC)the shelters and such are making it next to impossible to actually adopt a cat/dog/whatever.
its the radical agenda mentality.."animals should not be pets, its cruel... therefore we will deny them a home, because the only people who actually know how to care for them work at the shelter...."
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:12 pm (UTC)I really hope Edward Cat finds a home :(
(The reason for this policy is that many well-meaning people 'gift' an animal to a loved one that is a terrible match. The recipient then is either guilted into keeping an animal that is not their preferred breed/size/temperment/species OR has to rehome it.)
*soapbox*
I've heard horror stories about how hard it is to adopt from rescues and shelters (I volunteer at an SPCA). But the idea is to find a *forever* home, not just a 'hey, it's better than the shelter til we move and decide we don't want it anymore' home. People who give up one animal are more likely to do it again (I don't have a ref for this, I should probably find one).
Also people, in general, are morons. If you saw the bullshit reasons people gave for surrendering their animals, you'd become a hardass too. ("I got a new couch and her fur didn't match" was a real reason someone dropped off a beautiful 9 y.o. calico cat.)
/soapbox
Here are the magic answers to questionaires. Obviously I don't advocate flat-out lying, but potentially wonderful pet-owners get caught up in these all the time.
1) No, I have never given away/surrendered or lost (literally lost) a pet.
2) It will live with me in the house. (Not indoor-outdoor, not in a covered dog-run, not in a barn. HOUSE.)
3) For dogs: yes, I will persue/look into basic obedience training
4) This pet is for me, not a gift
5) Never admit to de-clawing your cats or intending to. (It is a horrible, horrible practice but many people still want it done.)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 03:41 pm (UTC)Wow. But, yes. After what I've seen, this sadly isn't a surprise.
And that's the dilemma, isn't it? People who seem perfectly sane right now will turn around and YEARS later make a decision that leaves your jaw hanging open. (See my story above about the lovely 8 year old cat sent to the shelter by owners who got a dog and suddenly the cat -- who they had declawed -- wanted 'too much attention'. Really? REALLY? Your pet of 8 years had no rights compared to the dog you JUST GOT? *rage* This cat now has a lovely home with a good friend of mine and in fact I'm catsitting her now and going over to play with her later, but still, it makes me angry at the former owners for being asshats.)
So the family that is so enthusiastic right now... it could turn out in 6 months or a year that something changes, you never know what, and suddenly... you only HOPE they are so responsible as to give the cat back to a no-kill shelter.
And... I would home a cat with my nearly-80, Parkinson's mother in a heartbeat... but I would also know that it was my responsibility, should she die before the cat does, to provide for the cat somehow. And I think quite often about the cat she DOES have now, should my mother die, because this is a lovely, pretty cat... and neurotic as hell. In 8 years, I have touched this cat once. She won't even let my mother pick her up. (My mom took her in, natch, and got a cat with way more neuroses than she realized.) I don't know what we'll do with her. But I know that I will take it very seriously, if the time comes. I can imagine, though, that a rescue would fret over whether the family of an older person would take it seriously. (I know my brother and his family would not take it as seriously as I will.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: