Hey, why not post now?
Dec. 11th, 2008 09:26 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Here's how you can tell I'm a bit more lackadaisical about the Oscars than I used to be: "Eh, Golden Globe noms at 7 am. They'll still be there when I wake up." So here they are. Surprises: love for In Bruges and Pineapple Express; nothing for The Dark Knight or Milk except supporting actor and actor, respectively. Mostly I'm just surprised that they didn't kiss The Dark Knight's ass so they'd have more movie stars show up and more fans tuning in. I mean, the Globes are kind of a joke even by awards show standards ("Be aware that the small motley local crew who belong to the scandal-riddled HFPA won't grant membership to real journalists at the prestige newspapers across the world"), so it's not like this would have been beneath them.
That said, I really do enjoy liveblogging the Globes a lot--they're the Drinky Oscars! So much more fun.
(Best headline on the subject I've seen all morning: 2009 Golden Globes: Good Year For Jokers, Midnight Tokers.)
Meanwhile, Globes dodge strike bullet, Oscars may not. An Oscars without writers = crappy; an Oscars without movie stars = POINTLESS.
Also, just because it is awesome and I happened to see it right now, The 'Watchmen' International Trailer Is Here!

That said, I really do enjoy liveblogging the Globes a lot--they're the Drinky Oscars! So much more fun.
(Best headline on the subject I've seen all morning: 2009 Golden Globes: Good Year For Jokers, Midnight Tokers.)
Meanwhile, Globes dodge strike bullet, Oscars may not. An Oscars without writers = crappy; an Oscars without movie stars = POINTLESS.
Also, just because it is awesome and I happened to see it right now, The 'Watchmen' International Trailer Is Here!


no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 03:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 08:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 04:06 pm (UTC)the actors shouldn't strike. we're in a recession. they don't need more money. and depriving america of the only form of diversion that helped us through the depression is going to make us have to watch only reality tv and turn us into sheep.
well... bigger sheep than we already are. does this mean we'll have to bring back storytime as the evening activity?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 04:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 05:06 pm (UTC)I've watched the Golden Globes off and on over the years, and my favorite moment ever (and this may be for all awards shows) was when Christine Lahti was in the bathroom when she won. Yay for alcohol, I guess.
In Bruges
Date: 2008-12-11 05:37 pm (UTC)Re: In Bruges
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 05:19 pm (UTC)Yeah, The Golden Globes are always more fun. I though everyone watched them because alcohol is involved. No? So I'm the only one who looks forward to Drunk!Sean Penn every year?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 07:45 pm (UTC)ETA: Here we are, it was the Screen Actors Guild awards: http://community.livejournal.com/dailydigestnews/14690.html
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 05:35 pm (UTC)I'm happy with the actor nominations, though, mostly because they're the most random things ever.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 05:51 pm (UTC)And I'm still staring at the Best Supporting Actor category and trying to make some sense out of it. I've seen Milk and Revolutionary Road and there are in those two movies alone four performances that are very much worthy of nomination. And yet, we have Tom Cruise. Something is wrong with this picture.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 06:19 pm (UTC)*SPAZ*
IT LOOKS AWESOME!!!
damn, i need an icon!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 06:36 pm (UTC)http://www.insanejournal.com/allpics.bml?user=wolfsilveroak
Towards the bottom of the list.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 06:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 06:30 pm (UTC)If Fox messes this up, it will be ON.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 10:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 06:47 pm (UTC)Its stars are aging character actors and a guy who's more known as Batman than his real name.
I'm not surprised it didn't make it too far--I predicted it wouldn't. As much money as The Dark Knight made, even overseas, he's not an inherently popular character internationally. And I imagine nobody from WB wined and dined the press.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 07:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 07:05 pm (UTC)But a strike would mean problems with TV and "New Moon" (as if it doesn't have enough already, *grumble grumble*), so I really hope it doesn't happen....
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 10:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 10:30 pm (UTC)you know...
Thank you for enlightening me so I can truly appreciate these things. =)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 10:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 12:24 am (UTC)I was oddly excited about the prospect of The Dark Knight getting some serious awards. After all, if comic movies can become legit, maybe someday horror movies can...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 01:11 am (UTC)I can has movie nao plz?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 01:16 am (UTC)