Back from a free movie!
Aug. 2nd, 2007 10:05 pmAwww, Stardust ! It was really sweet and fun and funny, and although the climactic battle/struggle/whatever could have been tightened up some, and I wasn't terribly fond of the score (there's a lot of THUNDERING SUSPENSE! USUALLY ON HORSEBACK! music, some of which sounded ripped straight out of Bram Stoker's Dracula), it was a solid three stars, two thumbs up, would pay to see again, will buy the DVD, etc. It's got pretty much everything important from the book (except what I always think of as The Best and Tiniest Part, but it was PG-13), but several things are changed to make it a bit more action-oriented towards the end, and the Captain Alberic character who gets all of four pages is now Captain Shakespeare, Robert De Niro, and hilarious. Yes, I'm easy like that. (Okay, some of it went on a little too long. Again: easy like that.) Also, it's got metric shitloads of "HEY WAIT WAS THAT--?" faces (and voices. "Awww, Uncle Gandalf's gonna tell us a story!"), including but not limited to Peter O'Toole, Rupert Everett, Ricky Gervais, Henry Cavill, Nathaniel Parker (who looks so incredibly much like Gregory Peck in this movie that it's not even funny), Jason Flemyng, Charlie Bucket's Grandpa Joe, Prince Caspian (fwoarrrr, he fine) and Mr. Weasley, who gets to play a goat. Hand to God, y'all. Also, it's got a really great, creative swordfight near the end, and y'all know how I feel about swordfights. In conclusion: if you remember loving the book but haven't read it in a while--and don't have the particulars fresh and sacred in your head--you'll probably really enjoy the movie.

no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 04:10 am (UTC)Honestly I knew about the Henry Cavill part, but the Prince Caspian comes as a surprise.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 04:15 am (UTC)I guess I need to read these things. It seems like a lot of books I've been meaning to read have been turning into movies lately (A Series of Unfortunate events, Eragon...and those just off the top of my head.)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 04:22 am (UTC)I JUST HAD TO.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 04:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 04:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 06:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 05:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 07:04 am (UTC)Film adaptations of Gaiman's work just never seem to work out to me.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 07:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 07:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 08:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 01:00 pm (UTC)I...I'm not sure what to say about this. Might do for good linkspam though.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 01:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 01:17 pm (UTC)So that was my problem with the book, in a nutshell. Not to mention that I guessed that Tristran was the grandson of Lord Stormhold as soon as that subplot was introduced. The movie looked good in the trailers, though, and I have high hopes for it. Especially since you said that there was actual *action* in this version.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:25 pm (UTC)(Are you going to order any of the BPAL scents? I really want the Yvaine one)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:54 pm (UTC)Okay, I'm convinced, I should see this now. Or just go rewatch all the episodes of The Tudors where he ain't wearing no pants.
Wait, what was I talking about?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 05:00 pm (UTC)You just made my day - I really adore the book and I've been so worried that the movie would be a huge letdown. Squeeness!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 05:19 pm (UTC)I have never read the book before (although I did mean to...I just kinda spent all my money on Fables, oops.) But I'm seeing that you are telling people not to re-read the book, so maybe I won't be totally lost?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 05:24 pm (UTC)I too saw an early screening...
Date: 2007-08-04 07:26 am (UTC)But yeah, my thoughts (http://dcmoviegirl.blogspot.com/2007/07/preview-stardust-and-little-potter.html) are pretty much in line with yours.
P.S.
That was my first and only website plug on your site. ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 10:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 12:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-13 03:41 am (UTC)I played the "Wait! Was that...?" Game with JUST the seven princes. The utter hilarity of the ghostly peanut gallery during the creative sword fight toward the end had me rolling on the floor.
And Nathaniel Parker! Hi, Inspector Lynley!!