Straight and narrow
Mar. 17th, 2004 02:44 pmGod, I got angry with my mother today. I was having lunch with her, and we started talking about a relative who's questioning his/her sexuality (I'm being vague only so as not to give the relative's identity away). My mother's always said she would love members of her family regardless of their sexual orientation. She's a youthful, sharp, energetic businesswoman, a conservative who's disillusioned with Dubya. But the conversation got more and more heated until she finally said, "Look, if that's the way that [s/he] wants to live their life, fine. When we all have to go before God and account for every action in our lives and all the gays are struck down--and they will be struck down--that's up to their conscience." And that's when I realized that she had meant, "I will love people in my family in spite of their sexual orientations."
All I could say was, "I'm not going to argue this with you right now."
All I could think was, You know, that's a pretty hypocritical stance for someone who doesn't go to church but watches the daily "Will & Grace" reruns religiously.
I love my mother; we're really close. But I think I'm come to understand the difference between an argument and a discussion--to take a line from
the_ferrett, you can't have a rational discussion if one or both parties has already decided that she's right. I like discussion. I hate arguments. And I've really come to think that gay rights is the civil rights issue of our generation. I'll discuss it with you, but I'm not arguing anymore.
"And they will be struck down." Jesus.
All I could say was, "I'm not going to argue this with you right now."
All I could think was, You know, that's a pretty hypocritical stance for someone who doesn't go to church but watches the daily "Will & Grace" reruns religiously.
I love my mother; we're really close. But I think I'm come to understand the difference between an argument and a discussion--to take a line from
"And they will be struck down." Jesus.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 01:53 pm (UTC)That's a big ouch.
While I do see your point - because there would have been a futility in arguing it - I'd still have countered it pretty severely. Don't think I personally could have let that one lie.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 06:29 am (UTC)Huh. Anywhere interesting?
Oh, and feel free to lurk around. S'what it's here for. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 04:44 pm (UTC)Christian doctrine is against homosexuality, and Christians believe that this doctrine has the endorsement of God. You can't argue against God. You can't argue that the doctrine is being misinterpreted, because it's been interpreted the same way for quite a long time. You might be able to argue that the doctrine is fallible, but such a discussion would attack a person's identity as a Christian, and do you really want to attack your mother's identity?
no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 08:58 pm (UTC)I mean, that's what Jesus would do (http://www.livejournal.com/users/kungfumegadevil/9757.html), I guess.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 09:52 pm (UTC)This is only shakily related, but I saw a bumper sticker the other day that said "Who Would Jesus Bomb?" I couldn't decide if it was being flaunted by a disillusioned right wing Christian or a pissed off liberal. Sort of brought me up short trying to figure it out.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 10:35 pm (UTC)But then again, humans who are prejudice against them aren't God, so what right do they have to say anything?
I'm still wavering. If that makes sense. I can't describe what I mean, without sounding more like an ass than I already do.
And I'm tired and hopped up on violent thoughts. Excuse me. *goes to write about death and destruction*
no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 10:47 pm (UTC)I'll admit, it does say that. (Where is that, Leviticus? I always forget.) I think that's why this argument always frustrates me, because that's an unimpeachable line of logic: "I believe in the Bible, and the Bible says this." I can't argue with that.
My problem, as a Christian, is that the Bible says a lot of things. It'll say we shouldn't eat this or that, or cut our hair this way, or work on Sunday, and none of us seem to bother paying attention to that. And God's word might be divine, but he used imperfect mortals as conduits. How do I know that everything in the Bible is something God wanted in there? I mean, we can't even keep our congressmen from sneaking extra clauses into the bills they're trying to pass. Maybe that sounds crazy. All flippancy aside, it is tough to know when to have faith and when to ask questions.
After a lot of thinking--reading Mere Christianity helped a little--I've come down to this: There is a God. That God is, as the book says, love. And in that spirit I should do unto others as I'd have done to me. And in that spirit, I have a hard time looking at my friend C. and saying, "You're going to hell for being in love and wanting to marry another man." That's all I know.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-17 11:21 pm (UTC)That's the reason why I don't believe in the inerrancy of the Bible.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 06:58 am (UTC)Keep in mind, too that the Bible was also translated from ancient Hebrew to Aramaic to English by a bunch of Monk interns, and anyone who's ever used babelfish knows that a lot can get lost in translation. So whenever anyone starts running around saying how they're a fundamentalist and obey the strict phrasing of the Bible, I always choke back the urge to say, "Oh, so you know ancient Hebrew and Aramaic, then?"
What gets my sacred goat about the whole argument, though, is that, really, who cares who other people sleep with, or get married to? It's not like homosexuality is contagious or something.
Straight Guy: Gee, I can get the same exact health benefits if I marry a guy? I guess I'll have to switch teams.