Linky-Link 4: Resurrection
Jul. 21st, 2006 03:49 pmHeh. The Disney email newsletter: Only One Movie Gets Better Every Time You See It. To be fair, it really does. Things even I thought were a bit long the first time around seemed to fly the second, and I've heard from numerous people who kind of liked it or didn't like it at all who were won over the second time. I just find it interesting that Disney would send this email out the weekend that Lady in the Water, Shyamalan's first movie away from Disney (they told him they didn't like the Lady script but they'd give him $60M to make it anyway; pride hurt, Shyamalan walked) opens.
(If the POTC3 picture was a photoshop, then someone put a hell of a lot of effort into it [or: more where that came from]. It seems like at least some of them--the more faraway shots, for example--are definitely real.)
Ouch. The "rotten" rating is going down as we speak--from 24% to 21% in two hours. "Lady in the Water challenges us to believe in the power of myth. But the big challenge here is surviving the tedium of Shyamalan's meandering inventiveness. What's supposed to be fanciful storytelling is really just audience punishment." And that's one of the good reviews.
From
celli, a link to
chaodai's thoughts on yaoi the movie: "if anyone ever tells you their movie is a tone poem, you actually have to beat them to death with a copy or aristotle's poetics before running off to the hills. look it up. it's the law."
Ghost Rider website/trailer on the internets. Am I the only person who sees this and thinks, "How profoundly, incredibly lame"?
Dakota Fanning, 12, to play rape victim in blatant Oscar grab. You think I'm kidding? "The screenplay for Hounddog - a dark story of abuse, violence and Elvis Presley adulation in the rural South, written and directed by Deborah Kampmeier - calls for Fanning's character to be raped in one explicit scene and to appear naked or clad only in 'underpants' in several other horrifying moments. Fanning's mother, Joy, and her Hollywood agent, Cindy Osbrink, see the movie as a possible Oscar vehicle for the pint-size star." Seriously, isn't there a way to write a child victim role where the abuse happens offscreen? Why do we have to watch simulated child rape? Unfortunately, the worst of it's already been filmed.
Colin Farrell has a close encounter. Of the crazy kind. This lady and the Crazy Us Weekly Guy™ need to hook up, for real.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 08:58 pm (UTC)On a lighter note (which isn't difficult):
(they told him they didn't like the Lady script but they'd give him $60M to make it anyway; pride hurt, Shyamalan walked)
WHAT??? Oh man, some studio please offer me 60 million for one of my stories. You can tell me you don't like the script all you want. ;-)
That's gotta be a nice place to be in, though, that he can walk away from an offer like that and know that someone else'll snap up his stuff in a heartbeat.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:07 pm (UTC)And so now LITW is being released by Warner Bros., who, as
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:01 pm (UTC)Oh.my.god. This idea makes me absolutely sick to my stomach. Her "mother" and "agent" should be ... man, I don't know what...ugh and two more doses of blech.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:03 pm (UTC)Anyway, I think that Lady in the Water will be good. Fuck the critics.
xxxoo ash
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:13 pm (UTC)The toys have done a disconcertingly good job at capturing Cage's likeness, though. (http://64.34.172.56/g/albums/2006_SDCC/Hasbro/Marvel/Ghost_Rider/IMG_1398.jpg) ()
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:22 pm (UTC)I'm an old school Johnny Blaze fangirl. I'm praying they put the Penance Stare into the film.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:18 pm (UTC)Ghost Rider is one of the classic visual designs in 20th century comics. Hell, Ghost Rider is one of the classic 20th century comics, period, in all of its hallucingenic glory. His backstory is great (man sells soul to devil to save best friend's life, finds himself possessed by a vengeance demon as penance, subsequently forever cursed to seek out and wreak vengeance on those that are evil), his design is great, and his powers were great.
But then, if you (general rhetorical you, not you specifically) can't see the brilliance of a flaming skeleton riding a hellfired motorcycle who has a power called the Penance Stare, then you should probably forfeit your 1) sense of the absurd and 2) never, ever have any contact with the technicolored, fantastical world of comics.
He's like Fin Fang Foom and Beta Ray Bill: an aquired taste. There's nothing else like Ghost Rider.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:26 pm (UTC)I am cautiously optimistic.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:28 pm (UTC)also...
Date: 2006-07-21 09:36 pm (UTC)(And on the flip side, how on earth does an actor play a rapist without feeling a little sick to his stomach? I mean, geez...)
Re: also...
Date: 2006-07-21 09:46 pm (UTC)Re: also...
From:Re: also...
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:48 pm (UTC)The music of Elvis is a lot of things, but consoling?
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 10:21 pm (UTC)I am going to see Lady in the Water , but I have a bad feeling about it. It does look odd.
The Dakota Fanning story really disturbs me. It disturbs me in that every report I've heard regarding this mentions how "explicit" and "graphic" the scene is. A 12 year old playing a rape victim is hard enough for me to imagine as it is (because, hell, I suspect a scene like that is difficult to play no matter how old you are), but the fact that it's been described as so horrible troubles me a little. And I don't care that she's very talented/mature/precocious - I personally don't believe that this kind of subject matter needs to be violently displayed on a movie screen. Ugh.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 10:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 10:27 pm (UTC)The thought of that Dakota Fanning movie makes me want to gouge out my eyeballs, to prevent any accidental viewing. *shuddering deeply*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 11:02 pm (UTC)Link-Link 5: HYPERLINK! wait... that's actually a real word.
Dammit!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 11:37 pm (UTC)Yes. They did it pretty well in Mysterious Skin which actually seemed pretty explicit, but on close viewing was clearly directed (and what reading I've done backs me up on this) in such a way that the young kids had no idea what they were filming. Not perfect - they could still pop in the DVD of their performance at the age of 12 and get scarred - but they were given some distance.
That said, if it's Dakota Fanning it's probably a starring role. Which means she'd get interviews about it, and have to be able to discuss it. Even if the abuse DID happen entirely offscreen, she'd still have to know the basics of what she was acting like, which could be plenty damaging. In Mysterious Skin, the stars were older versions of the kids who actually got abused.
As for the actual seeing naked dakota fanning and/or simulated rape of her, yeah, I have no interest in watching that. It will probably backfire, or the worst of it will be cut.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 12:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 12:57 am (UTC)Well, fuck. I have a highly obnoxious 12 year old cousin who worships Dakota Fanning. I can't imagine her mother letting her anywhere near the movie, but all the same I hope she doesn't take this too hard. And I agree with you about that kind of shudder-worthy shit like that being completely unnecessary in a film. In the right hands, it would be even more terrifying if left to the imagination of the viewer.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 01:19 am (UTC)*puts away Captain Jack T-shirt*
And I'm going to see Lady in the Water tomorrow. Screw the critics. I think I have yet to agree with a single thing they've said this year.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 02:47 am (UTC)Oh no! Not Dakota Fanning! (insert several minutes of stunned silence)
Okay, that's that.
On a lighter note, I'm disappointed that Lady in the Water wasn't a remake of Mermaid in a Manhole, which would've been awesome, in a creepy, stomach-churning, eye-gouging kind of way.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 05:54 am (UTC)Maybe I'm just cynical, but if she is such a good actress, surely one can assume that eventually in her lifetime she will receive some form of recognition for her talent without having to sacrifice psychological health at such a young age.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 07:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 02:35 pm (UTC)-sigh-
And a 12 year old girl does -not- need to be naked for millions of people to see. Why would her mother let her do this. grrr!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 09:18 pm (UTC)Curiously, that's something I use to say about... M. Night Shyamalan's movies. *scratches head* No kidding. I saw the Sixth Sense for the first time? I was kind of 'mneh'. By the fifth time I watched it though? ZOMGBATMAN! Worship Level.
This accounts for about every Shyamalan's prod that I was able to see more than once (still have to do that with Unbreakable, which COMPLETELY PISSED ME OFF), save for The Village. Which I loved at first sight. Heh.
I read about 1/3 of the review for Lady in the Water that you posted (the link for) yesterday and stopped at it because (a) didn't want to 'spoil' myself with someone else's opinion, however competent it was, and (b) it didn't seem to rail so much about the movie as on Shyamalan's Ego, which... I'm really not interested in (...maybe that's how I'm 'saved'?). If the movie'll do something for me, it'll do, regardless of what the author possibly ever intended it to be.
The Dakota Fanning thing is... scary, expecially by her agent and OWN MOTHER's declarations (!!!).