(no subject)
Jun. 20th, 2006 12:00 pmJust as a coda to the Charlotte Lennox thing, we have at least two confirmations of some of the skullduggery. Given that she's admitted to being sporkify and the police have definitively disproven the Louis Movello thing, it's pretty much over, I think. I'm saying this because--it's none of my business, but--well, hell, I'm always sticking my nose into everything, so why stop now? A lot of good has come from people realizing that they were deceived and fed misinformation, and a lot of old feuds are being resolved. I'm largely seeing people who are more than willing to reconcile and forgive and write a lot of mistakes off as the influence of one person. But there are a few people doing the ostrich thing, I'm hearing--burying their heads and claiming it's not important or that it doesn't matter that people were hurt. I have a feeling that a lot of this reaction is caused by fear and--not guilt, exactly, but feeling very uncomfortable with what's been revealed. Worrying that people are going to gloat at them, or rub in past mistakes, or do the dance of I Told You So. And I just wanted to take this opportunity to say that I'm not seeing that. I'm seeing a lot of people coming together and embracing anyone who fell afoul of this person, whether they were attacked or whether they acted, unknowingly, on her misinformation. I'm just saying, don't be afraid. No one's going to make you eat crow. If you were a good friend of this person, no one's asking you to burn her at the stake without question. I've seen several people comment on the Charlotte Lennox entries saying that they think it's perfectly reasonable that a close friend might start asking questions, but wouldn't desert someone entirely. No one's demanding that you defriend people and renounce them and believe everything the accusers say unquestioningly. It's just that, in the the long run, it'll be a lot better to say, "Okay, clearly something is going on here, and I don't know how I feel about that yet, but yes, people were hurt, and they have my sympathy" than to just pretend that it didn't happen or it doesn't matter. You don't have to bow and scrape and beg forgiveness for some vague sin. Just acknowledge that something hurtful happened, even if we're still in the discovery process and aren't entirely sure what's what yet. I think acknowledgement is all that people really want from others who were equally deceived.

no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 05:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 05:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 05:37 pm (UTC)I lost a lot of friends over that. Not because they'd been taken in as I had, but because they'd covered it up and left her free to do it again and again and again.
It's never a crime to be deceived. It's admirable to want to stand by your friends. If her friends can find out what happened, perhaps present a different version or clear up some of the confusion/timeline, I'd say more power to them.
... but to try to decry the fact that someone wanted to have the facts be known or to attempt to cover the entire thing over....
That's just never a good idea and as a lot of these people are serial offenders, bringing it out into the open is a good move, if only to help keep others from having the same thing happen to them.
I feel really, really bad for everyone involved and I remember watching most of this from the sidelines and just... cringing.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:23 pm (UTC)Now, all this was very clear on the site; Christina and her daughter could be very artful in their postings (talking about the cancer and then immediately jumping to 'need money for this trip'), but they never actual lied that I saw, and the site had scans of various correspondence.
But when people pointed this out, there was absolute foaming rage and people would scream again and again SHE'S DYING OF CANCER. It was freaky, the complete denial of reality even though you could see the evidence right on Christina's site.
As far as I could tell, basically a there had been a long standing war in HP fandom, and one faction had seized on this as a club to bring the other side down. And they were so desperate to do this that when people pointed out that it wasn't actually a very good club that they went ballastic in rage.
Now, all of this doesn't mean that msscribe or whoever was couldn't have been happily using the war going on to attack Christina unfairly; as I said, while she was artful about letting people draw wrong conclusions, she didn't directly lie that I saw and the facts were on her site for people who were capable of logical analysis. But the fact that whoever this chronicler is is using the lie "dying of cancer" to make msscribe look worse... well, looks to me like just another variant on the same game as msscribe is being accused of playing (and may have been.)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:28 pm (UTC)I've seen some gloating, and a lot of, "How could you be that stupid, to fall for that?"
If this brings closure to people who were genuinely hurt, then that's wonderful. However, I'm noticing a lot of people proclaiming that "THIS STORY MUST BE TOLD!" who weren't there, and who weren't at all involved. Speaking as someone who was in the fandom at the time, and who was tangentially involved--I'm not feeling the righteous anger. The biggest thing that she's accused of is actually something she didn't do--shutting down GT. To me, it's more sad than anything, as well as being a searing commentary on the Cult of the BNF in fandom. Whoever she really is, she's a very sick person, and I hope for the sake of her family that she gets the help she needs...but I just don't have it in me to gloat.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:02 pm (UTC)Finding out a person you cared for and trusted has pulled something like this must be like being cheated on. That level of hurt and betrayal and humiliation. I definitely think that they're as much her victims as those who were slandered.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 08:27 pm (UTC)Makes all of my other fandoms seem like welcoming bastions of sanity, and I'm in some batshit fandoms, to be sure.
I can't help but wonder at the timing of all of this.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 11:01 pm (UTC)I have never believed that one or a few fans represent a certain site e.g., that fermatojam was representative of people at GT forums or of the GT admins. But if I ever gave the impression that GT was a place where Nutty Christians were welcome or where racism was tolerated, I apologize for that. If I did give that impression that was my fault, I was misinformed but I should also have taken what I was told with a bigger grain of salt.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:05 am (UTC)I'm one of the ones over at bad_penny saying, no, her friends deserve the chance to investigate for themselves. Because I'm not one of her friends, and I never was. But lots of my friends - including
And if this was me - if I was accused of doing all this - I'd desperately want to believe that my friends would not believe the words of a stranger (albeit a well-researched and persuasive one) before coming to me and asking me for an explanation.
I don't know that fandom as a whole can be asked to give msscribe the benefit of doubt, but I do believe her friends have the right to their own investigations, whatever they choose to pursue.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 08:57 pm (UTC)And that's what happened back in 2003/4 -
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:25 am (UTC)Totally Unrelated
Date: 2006-06-21 01:52 am (UTC)Re: Totally Unrelated
Date: 2006-06-21 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 03:22 am (UTC)thanks for posting it.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 06:35 pm (UTC)Totally off topic but so necessary
Date: 2006-06-21 05:14 pm (UTC)AOL requires deceased customer to call to cancel service (http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/top/aol-wants-to-sell-%22internet%22-to-the-dead-182185.php)
Audio of customer trying to cancel AOL service (http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/top/the-best-thing-we-have-ever-posted%3A-reader-tries-to-cancel-aol-180392.php)
This is insane! Why haven't they been sued?
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 05:47 pm (UTC)What's funny though, is that while whole wars have been raised in shipping, it usually turns out that the shipping is almost a footnote to the mess created in forums, ljs and the like. Shipping almost becomes a "non-point", the small grain which everything is precariously balanced on. People take shipping as an IDENTITY and not as an ISSUE, and as an identity warrants such passionate defending and attacks. I think Msscribe was very successful in drawing out the prejudices of people involved in ship wars, as the writer of this "expose" said, and manipulating sympathies because, as I mentioned, topics like shipping usually take an intensely personal facade when in truth, shipping is only shipping. Shipping is only a preference. It is is not a belief system. Shipping is shipping: Nothing more and nothing else.
I think the same is true as to the other issues that became identities -- the charity fights, the Bush supporters -- instead of taking a step back and surveyed the bigger picture, it might have been a smaller war. I think this just brings to light that there's still a lot of intolerance going around, intolerance in the sense that we are not as open or as willing to accept other people's opinions as we think we are.
In any case, a very interesting read. Thank you for linking it.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-24 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 05:54 pm (UTC)I can't imagine, can't even begin to imagine how the people closest to her must be feeling. I don't know any of them, didn't even know who this msscribe was before I started reading, and.. I just feel for them. It sucks for everyone involved.