(no subject)
Mar. 21st, 2005 10:26 pmNothing much to report today, as have been in class and working. Except that Vladimir is sick, woe.
Oh, and this: This is the new content that's supposed to keep people coming to Fametracker?
(PearDream72 at the Snarkfest boards: "Celebrity vs Thing is the fruit that has been born from all the free time Wing & Co. have because they no longer have to moderate the boards? I am beginning to have grave doubts about FT’s commitment to Sparkle Motion.")
Oh, and this: This is the new content that's supposed to keep people coming to Fametracker?
(PearDream72 at the Snarkfest boards: "Celebrity vs Thing is the fruit that has been born from all the free time Wing & Co. have because they no longer have to moderate the boards? I am beginning to have grave doubts about FT’s commitment to Sparkle Motion.")
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 04:28 am (UTC)But yeah. Seems rather...crap.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 04:32 am (UTC)28: 06: 42: 12
Date: 2005-03-22 04:31 am (UTC)Re: 28: 06: 42: 12
Date: 2005-03-22 04:33 am (UTC)Re: 28: 06: 42: 12
Date: 2005-03-22 05:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 04:33 am (UTC)(even though I think I would rather go without CZJ)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 04:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 05:01 am (UTC)What makes "Celebrity vs. Thing" so depressing is that it's so derivative of everything else they've already done--it's like the logical extreme you'd reach if you wanted to write a FT parody article. I mean... seriously, are you kidding me? This is going to be a regular feature? They shut down the forums
because they were losing shitloads of moneyto have more time to work on this?no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 04:41 am (UTC)Even now when I still flit about the site, it's despite -- and not because of -- the personalities. Less is certainly more when it comes to TV reviews, I think.
Or it could be simply that the personalities in question were just too irritating -- as I could read the Cleo's reviews of every known variety of Ramen noodles and come out unscathed. I don't know if that's a matter of style, talent, focus or just a personal taste.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 04:44 am (UTC)And then... God bless Pamie; I used to love her blog, and her "Young Americans" recaps made me *cry* with laughter. But right now, all people can talk about is how her "Gilmore Girls" recaps were about nothing but Stee and her wedding and her many blogs and random stories about her life or family. Oh, and how much she hates "Gilmore Girls." This is a bad sign, yo.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 02:03 pm (UTC)You know, I can't read Djb's recaps to save my LIFE.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 06:55 am (UTC)Where? :D
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 05:20 am (UTC)On the TWoP front: Pamie's Wonderfalls recaps bugged me more than her Gilmore Girls ones. She only did a few (the show got canceled), but in every one all she did was whine about how much she hated the show, how she was only recapping it because no one else would, and how we should all be grateful that she was missing out on fun parties so she could sit at home rewatching such a terrible program. I don't care that she disliked the show -- I think it's excellent and I ran a campaign (http://www.savewonderfalls.com) to save it and everything, but I can respect that it's not everyone's cup of tea -- but I don't think anyone should be forced to recap something they detest. The recaps just end up bitter and unfunny.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 06:00 am (UTC)Shannon Elizabeth vs. apple pie? Oh wait, that's been done.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 07:51 am (UTC)see exhibit a) Charmed. They're not funny. They aren't even snarky. They're mean. And they're mean on a level that goes way beyond the show and is like a personal attack on the actors and actresses. It's just mean. I had to stop reading those.
see exhibit b) 7th Heaven. These still have some humor in them, but I don't think it can outlast the writer's violent hatred of the show.
I basically only read Miss Alli recaps now.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 02:59 pm (UTC)And I thought I was the only one tired of Pamie's recaps-that-aren't. Nice to know I'm paying attention. Sort of.
I agree on Miss Alli, though. She makes The Apprentice seem more entertaining than it really is.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 05:39 am (UTC)Celeb vs. THING.
Catherine Zeta-Jones vs. BAGELS.
Is that one of those humor through randomness? Because uh.... I usually go for shit like that but... CZJ vs BAGELS?!
Oh shit. I give up. I just don't get it. Thank God I live in a world where I can have both Catherine and.. uh.. bagels.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 05:58 am (UTC)Now, you pit her against a blueberry or a chocolate chip bagel? She's goin' DOWN.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 06:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 06:54 am (UTC)That said? I kinda liked it. OH GOD PLEASE DON'T HIT ME. I thought it mildly amusing, and liked the Zeta Jones, Space Pirate" thing, because I like pirates. I know I'm sad. Shut up.
This does not, however, make me like the (erstwhile) mods any better. It's doubly frustrating to me that people who could write genuinely hysterical critiques of celebrity culture at one point could turn out to be such uncool, pissy, trigger-happy me-monkeys when dealing with others. Sometimes I think they let so many losers on the boards for the same reason vain women choose ugly bridesmaids.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 06:59 am (UTC)Although I still want to know what was up with the Brooke Smith HITG! last week. "Hey, we need to pimp Pamie's new blog! Anybody in Silence of the Lambs we can pass off as a character actor?"
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 07:28 am (UTC)(Deliberate bad grammar. Just in that kind of mood.)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 10:22 am (UTC)With that said...wow, that article was not particularly funny or clever. And you were right on the money about the Brooke Smith Hey... I mean, if you're going to do tribute to a Hey... SOTL cast member, where is the loving tribute to Diane Baker? "Take this monstah back to Baltimore!" Sigh. Awesome.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 02:47 pm (UTC)BTW, you know that new "Lost" is supposed to happen next week, right? I'd hate for you to miss a show.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 02:50 pm (UTC)