An entry about nothing important at all
Mar. 16th, 2005 06:37 amHoroscope of DOOM:
Quickie: A problem can be like a splinter in your foot unless you do something about it.
Overview: For the next couple of days, absolutely nothing will be more important to you than taking care of the ones you love -- and that might well pertain to one person in particular.
It's a little-known fact that you are an expert caretaker. It's not just because you can make anyone laugh at any time -- although laughter, after all, really is the best medicine. You're also quite intuitive and know immediately what your charge needs, oftentimes before they do. So when a dear one comes to you, obviously worn out and in need of a helping hand, you'll be more than happy to do whatever you can to help.
Weird.
Dear Braveheart: Please magically split into more chapters. This movie is seventeen hours long, and it's got twenty-one chapter stops. I'm about to wear out my "search" buttons looking for basic scenes. What. Ever.
That said, it's coming along really, really well. I am a little worried about making fun of the prince's flaming effeminacy so much--it's one of those things where you've got to show that you're making fun of the movie portraying him that way, you know? Anyway.
Nothing terribly important, just some linkspam I need to clear out:
A new update on Gaiman!Beowulf from Neil's journal.
A new Harry Potter poster. Dear marketing department: I can do better than this, kthnx. (ETA: I should have been more clear. This "poster" was scanned in from a kids' magazine. It is not a theatrical poster. Because that would just be sad. Even so? I can STILL come up with something better than this.)
More pics from A History of Violence.
The Ring 2 gallery at OutNow. Warning: spoilers and giant pictures of Samara glaring at you.
Mmm, breakfast.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 12:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 12:50 pm (UTC)Uh...they're not even trying, are they? It reminds me of how the TWoP posters are making better VM ads than UPN is.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:14 pm (UTC)A higher-up you've admired and respected for some time is about to let you know that the feelings are mutual -- and what could be better than having the respect of your mentor? Sure does make you feel good just to be you, right? Keep in mind, though, that if you hadn't earned this, it wouldn't be coming your way. Isn't a celebration in order? Once you get your heels back on the ground, that is.
Celebration? More like needing a secret stash of comfort food >.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:24 pm (UTC)As for the HP poster, I think Daniel and Rupert could've had better pictures. Maybe there will be a nicer poster later that actually has a background. As someone else said, Emma looks great. But doesn't she always. I'd roll my eyes, but it's too early in the morning.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:33 pm (UTC)what a swell cleft in his chin....
*walks off whistling the tune*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:43 pm (UTC)I looked at The Ring photos. I don't know why I did that; the first movie scared me for DAYS... ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:52 pm (UTC)after Iseen it, I unplugged my TV, and I still sleep withmy light on.... im such a wimp xD
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:57 pm (UTC)And good luck on the Braveheart M15M- it's sure to be great.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 05:19 pm (UTC)(And thanks. : )
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 01:59 pm (UTC)I'm not a Watson-hater or anything, but it was still "Harry Potter and the blah-blah-adventurecakes" the last time I checked. Not quite The Hermione Show. *g*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 02:04 pm (UTC)BTW, have you seen the Sin City article in Premiere? Seems like everyone in the cast was majorly geeking out over the project, especially Elijah: 'It was too much, man. My little geek mind could not contain it.' Awww, cute. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 02:12 pm (UTC)You know what's funny? In the Cursed Kings book 1 he's portrayed as coarse and crude, one of the guys type of guys' guy. Butch, in other words.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 02:18 pm (UTC)And seeing what you could do with David Lynch simply entertains the heck out of me.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 02:26 pm (UTC)Dear Braveheart: Please magically split into more chapters. This movie is seventeen hours long, and it's got twenty-one chapter stops. I'm about to wear out my "search" buttons looking for basic scenes. What. Ever. Mel's movies are usually 17 hours long aren't they? At least in my mind they are. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:01 pm (UTC)Hey,
Dude, what happened to Samara's face? She's gone from looking creepy to looking constipated!
I really like both the Japanese *and* US versions of THE RING. Sadako, in the Japanese one, is a creepier entity than Samara, but the video itself and the final attack are creepier in the US one. I didn't care for the Japanese RING 2, which featured the hokiest pseudo-experiments this side of MISFITS OF SCIENCE, so the US remake could be something special, so long as Samara gets some fibre in her diet *g*.
Wirrrn!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:08 pm (UTC)Hey,
That said, it's coming along really, really well. I am a little worried about making fun of the prince's flaming effeminacy so much--it's one of those things where you've got to show that you're making fun of the movie portraying him that way, you know? Anyway.
-Was this litte Aussie poof surprised at Mel Gibson taking an opportunity to present a stereotypical view of Gay folks and play a homophobic murder for laughs? No, sadly he was not...
Wirrrn!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 05:29 pm (UTC)My problem is that I'm having to play the whole movie for laughs. How do you make fun of something that's played as funny but shouldn't have been? You end up with (pulls up draft) clumsy crap like this, is what happens:
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:18 pm (UTC)^^; Just so you know.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:23 pm (UTC)Considering that it showed up on a fansite first I have doubts about it's veracity. The next time I go to the store I'm going to look through a Nickelodean magazine just to prove to myself that the marketing department really is this stupid.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:26 pm (UTC)anyone notice that Hermione looks evil, ron looks HOMELESS, and harry looks.... old. shit he got OLD.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 04:02 pm (UTC)anyone notice that Hermione looks evil, ron looks HOMELESS, and harry looks.... old. shit he got OLD.
And that's almost a plot bunny.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 05:33 pm (UTC)(The [un?]fortunate side effect of all this is that I end up watching all these movies 42 times, and by the end of it, I'm always like, "Wow, that movie is so much better than I ever gave it credit for!" Which is an eye-opener when it's Titanic. It's just scary when it's Independence Day.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:28 pm (UTC)-Clayr
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:32 pm (UTC)Dear Warner Brothers: We already know what the actors look like. Sure, they're teenagers, but they haven't changed that much since the last movie. Pls. to show us something *interesting*? That might, you know, make me want to go see the movie it's supposed to be promoting?
Thanks. ~me
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 03:39 pm (UTC)Why is Dan Radcliffe looking more like John Lennon every time I see him?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 04:17 pm (UTC)if youve mentioned this, or seen it already- my apologies--
http://www.playbill.com/news/article/91746.html
good. god.
a musical.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-16 05:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: