(no subject)
Feb. 28th, 2005 08:47 amNnnnnngh. Burlap... bag... beaten with... reeds.... nnnngharrrrr. I was up for another couple of hours trying to read comments after that last entry, mostly because I can't just fall straight into bed after several hours of tension and/or excitement; I have to unwind for a while. Also, I did laundry. And I still got a good seven hours of sleep. It's just something about sitting there and having to be on for that long--desperately trying to be witty on the fly.
And then there were the comments. Lots and lots of comments.
Those are just the comments from the entries I forgot to turn off email notification for. So I went through and tried to read as many as I could--I'm going back through and re-enabling notification as well. But there were probably 1000+. Rest assured, however, that I read everything that was there as of midnight last night.
Wing and Sars from TWOP also blogged the Oscars (for Yahoo), but the headline "near-real-time blow-by-blow" on TWOP makes me think they fudged a bit.
Horoscope of the Day: In order to appreciate the value of winning, you have to lose sometimes.
Oh, you've got to be kidding me. Vladimir is still heartbroken over The Aviator losing last night, whereas I still can't believe it beat out Snicket for costumes and Snicket AND Phantom for set design. And I was rooting for The Aviator.
But that's okay, because I woke up in a world where Cate Blanchett has an Oscar, and that's a better world than yesterday's.
Link from
sunshine95: The E! Backstage Blog:
And then there were the comments. Lots and lots of comments.
Those are just the comments from the entries I forgot to turn off email notification for. So I went through and tried to read as many as I could--I'm going back through and re-enabling notification as well. But there were probably 1000+. Rest assured, however, that I read everything that was there as of midnight last night.
Wing and Sars from TWOP also blogged the Oscars (for Yahoo), but the headline "near-real-time blow-by-blow" on TWOP makes me think they fudged a bit.
Horoscope of the Day: In order to appreciate the value of winning, you have to lose sometimes.
Oh, you've got to be kidding me. Vladimir is still heartbroken over The Aviator losing last night, whereas I still can't believe it beat out Snicket for costumes and Snicket AND Phantom for set design. And I was rooting for The Aviator.
But that's okay, because I woke up in a world where Cate Blanchett has an Oscar, and that's a better world than yesterday's.
Link from
9:40 p.m.: "I've been looking forward to this all evening." Best Supporting Actress winner Cate Blanchett says as she faces the press, and I think she's being facetious. And then she turns her back on the press and quaffs a drink, and I know she's not being facetious.BWAH.
9:47 p.m: Blanchett, on whether the Oscar will turn her into a diva: "Absolutely, you asshole!"
9:49 p.m.: Blanchett wraps her press conference, but not her thirst. "Can I get back to the champagne now?" she says as she heads off.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 02:49 pm (UTC)And I thought getting 100 from my community was bad...
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 02:57 pm (UTC)Also, I'm reading the... AOL blog?... ANd HAHAHAHAHA
6:03 PM PT
Damn, Beyonce, leave some eye shadow for the rest of us.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:02 pm (UTC)Is this you, or Natalie Portman's Oscar dress?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:29 pm (UTC)As for me, I stopped watching the Oscars about halfway through, and later, of course, came here first for all the news. In fact, your journal ties with SNL and Conan O'Brien for my primary news sources. I love that. :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:35 pm (UTC)::searches for Cleo oscar coverage from beginning::
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:37 pm (UTC)I tried reading Sars and Wing's thing, but I stopped when I realized they were just going to be mean instead of funny. You were much better.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 04:25 pm (UTC)gotta love cate... ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 06:32 pm (UTC)Livejournal
If...
From contains "LiveJournal"
Then...
Move message to livejournal folder
Livejournal2
If...
From contains "LJ Comment"
Then...
Move message to livejournal folder
Two filters seem to do it. : )
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 07:57 pm (UTC)But now? I love her. Caaaaaaaaate!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-01 12:21 am (UTC)while i completely agree they probably fudged it, it was still funny. although yours was better. yes.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-01 02:28 am (UTC)