(no subject)
Quick clarification on the Virginia story: I read the whole spiel at Daily Kos, and apparently what they're trying to do is target women who abandon babies in dumpsters. The problem is that the PROPOSED LAW does not target them. It's like saying that if anyone, anywhere, dies for any reason (heart attack? well-documented terminal illness? old age?), it's got to be reported to the homicide squad. If they want to target baby-dumping, they need to DO THAT, rather than force every single woman who ever miscarries at any stage of gestation, anywhere, to account for herself. You know, with words like "abandoning" and "receptacles not intended for babies, such as dumpsters, or the occasional birdbath."
Also, I just got back from class, and the professor raffled off her "desk copies" of our texts by having us choose a number between 1 and 100. Guess who won a brand new copy of Uncle Tom's Cabin? WHEE.
Also, I just got back from class, and the professor raffled off her "desk copies" of our texts by having us choose a number between 1 and 100. Guess who won a brand new copy of Uncle Tom's Cabin? WHEE.
no subject
If they want to target baby-dumping, they need to DO THAT
The commenters at Kos said that VA already HAS baby-dumping laws.
The commenters at Metafilter and some other places felt that this was A) an attempt to make a miscarriage the same as an infant death; B) track those 'miscarriages' produced by EC and RU-486; and C) prepare for a post-Roe US in which all fertile women and pregnancies are tracked, such as happened in Romania (http://www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/psy_ocr9.asp).
no subject
no subject