(no subject)
Jan. 7th, 2005 03:28 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Quick clarification on the Virginia story: I read the whole spiel at Daily Kos, and apparently what they're trying to do is target women who abandon babies in dumpsters. The problem is that the PROPOSED LAW does not target them. It's like saying that if anyone, anywhere, dies for any reason (heart attack? well-documented terminal illness? old age?), it's got to be reported to the homicide squad. If they want to target baby-dumping, they need to DO THAT, rather than force every single woman who ever miscarries at any stage of gestation, anywhere, to account for herself. You know, with words like "abandoning" and "receptacles not intended for babies, such as dumpsters, or the occasional birdbath."
Also, I just got back from class, and the professor raffled off her "desk copies" of our texts by having us choose a number between 1 and 100. Guess who won a brand new copy of Uncle Tom's Cabin? WHEE.
Also, I just got back from class, and the professor raffled off her "desk copies" of our texts by having us choose a number between 1 and 100. Guess who won a brand new copy of Uncle Tom's Cabin? WHEE.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:06 pm (UTC)"Does it count if I admire the typeface & the binding of the book?"
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 04:01 pm (UTC)But maybe that's just me.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-08 11:05 am (UTC)As they should be. My plans used to be far more complex and ultimately destructive, however I decided to tone it down for sanity's sake. They used to involve such things as a rocket launcher, accelerant, and a skywriter... I'll leave the rest to the imagination.
I was only sad that I did not have a convenient chandelier to drop on anyone :(
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:37 pm (UTC)How are they going to enforce this? I have a friend who had two miscarriages last year. She wasn't even aware of the first one. It wasn't until she had the second one, that (with confirmation from her physician) that they realized that the earlier event had also been a miscarriage.
Many, many women have miscarriages very, very early in pregnancy and the embryo simply falls into the toilet or onto a pad and is gone with no one ever being the wiser.
I had a miscarriage in 1997. I had only just realized I was pregnant and pee'd on the stick. The next day, I started bleeding....and bleeding...and bleeding. I never bothered to report it. WHY would I?
Geez, some people really need to get their heads out of women's wombs.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:37 pm (UTC)If they want to target baby-dumping, they need to DO THAT
The commenters at Kos said that VA already HAS baby-dumping laws.
The commenters at Metafilter and some other places felt that this was A) an attempt to make a miscarriage the same as an infant death; B) track those 'miscarriages' produced by EC and RU-486; and C) prepare for a post-Roe US in which all fertile women and pregnancies are tracked, such as happened in Romania (http://www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/psy_ocr9.asp).
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 05:00 pm (UTC)Now if they'd teach birth control along with abstinence... but I'm asking too much, I'm sure...
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-08 07:47 am (UTC)Sex! For fun! :O
The end goal is that no one ever has sex with anyone other than their lawfully wedded, opposite-sex spouse, if and only if they are prepared to be parents. Not that there's any wrong with that, should it be one's cup of tea. But when anything else is just hedonistic and decadent and immoral and shameful, I for one have a problem with the concept.
It's also head-buried-in-sand impractical. People fornicate and commit adultery at times and in places when it means(meant) no-holds-barred, guaranteed, painful death. Women have and do terminate pregnancies even when the risks to their own lives far outweigh the possibility of surviving the procedure. As far as I know, outlawing this stuff has never, ever worked.
I wish people would take all that "thou shalt not" energy and apply it to making the world a place where unplanned pregnancy doesn't end life as women know it. One where a woman's identity and choices in life don't just disappear into "you're someone's mother now, you can't...you must...you should..."
I agree with the person who once told me that raising a child is the most important and meaningful thing a woman can take on, but I don't agree that taking it on should render every other endeavor prohibitively difficult, impossible or meaningless. As long as it does, women need to be in control of when or if it happens.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:06 pm (UTC)While I'm pondering that one, I'll just register my disgust at that misarriage law thing. It's not only morally wrong, it's just insane. Like death taxes, only like a thousand times worse.
AHA! IT WAS YOU! *end*
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-08 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 04:26 pm (UTC)Maybe you can just write the
cleolinda-version of SparkNotes for Uncle Tom's Cabin and save some of the rest of us the trouble. ;) Though I imagine that by now you're like "If I have to read this AGAIN, they can read it too."
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 04:43 pm (UTC)Right now my knowledge of the book consists of a scrap of lyric from Stephen Sondheim ("so why watch me die like Eliza on the ice?"), my APUSH teacher's urging us to read it, and the King & I version ("The little house of Uncle Thomas"). Hopefully I just won't need to find out more.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 04:47 pm (UTC)Hee. Well, I mean, I did like a one-paragraph bit on Samson Agonistes. That kind of thing wouldn't have been out of the question. Except for the jarjarative qualities.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 05:19 pm (UTC)Also read The Sound and the Fury for AP-had the same feelings. I consider myself well read, but I JUST NOW started reading Catch-22 for the first time and I swear I have never taken this long to read a book... 6 days thus far and I'm only half way through. The craziness-she hurts my brain.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 07:15 pm (UTC)I don't remember a damned thing about either book.
craziness
Date: 2005-01-07 05:43 pm (UTC)Re: craziness
Date: 2005-01-08 10:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 06:25 pm (UTC)And also, the miscarriage thing? How are they planning to enforce it? If you had a miscarriage in your own home, they could hardly find out about it.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 07:56 pm (UTC)At least you don't have to, like, pay for a copy.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 11:24 pm (UTC)I completely agree that this law misses it's intended goal by a mile. When we stage our coups I'll be sure that the vassalage of virginia has good relations with the Queendom of Alabama.
Sorry if this makes no sense, the insomniac dumb assedness of the entire day has caught up with me and I am behaving eccentricly.
Hi
Date: 2005-01-08 01:14 am (UTC)It's about 6 months roo late, but oh well.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-08 10:35 am (UTC)