ext_2705: (Default)
ext_2705 ([identity profile] zoniduck.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] cleolinda 2005-11-16 12:17 am (UTC)

You know what? This happened in Kentucky, not Texas. Where did I get the idea that it was Texas? Be that as it may, apparently, the sodomy laws in Kentucky were struck down in 1992 by the Supreme Court of Kentucky. I have no explanation for why the state would have charged the man with sodomy if the law is no longer on the books.

As far as why the paper used the term, the only thing I can think is that they had a resonable expectation that their readership would understand the term to mean oral sex. It makes no sense to me, though.

I was just reading the linked article about the fiancee's sentencing. They finally did work out a plea bargain. The girl finally agreed to it. Because Nix said that he would make a statement that he was sorry, and that she had done nothing wrong. God. It absolutely breaks my heart what was done to that poor kid, not just by all the people who participated in the event, but by McDonalds corporate. Those fuckers.

Supersize Me wasn't enough to make me stop eating at McDonalds, but it'll be a cold day in Hell if these fuckers ever see another dime of my money now. I need a rage icon.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting